Kang Donghoon, Choi Myung-Gyu, Shim Ki-Nam, Jung Hye-Kyung, Nam Seung-Joo, Park Jung Ho, Kim Sang Gyun, Kim Nam-Hoon, Hong Su Jin, Jeon Tae Joo, Chung Jae Il, Lee Hang Lak, Lee Ju Yup, Kim Tae Oh, Lee Chang Min, Kim Sun Moon, Kim Jeong-Hwan, Kim Jang Eon, Moon Jeong Seop, Kim Ho Dong, Lee Wan-Sik, Park Hong Jun
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Center, Seoul 07985, South Korea.
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 28;30(48):5152-5161. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5152.
For the treatment of gastritis, rebamipide, a mucoprotective agent, and nizatidine, a gastric acid suppressant, are commonly employed individually.
To compare the efficacy of Mucotra SR (rebamipide 150 mg) and Axid (nizatidine 150 mg) combination therapy with the sole administration of Axid in managing erosive gastritis.
A total of 260 patients diagnosed with endoscopically confirmed erosive gastritis were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 4 clinical trial, allocating them into two groups: Rebamipide/nizatidine combination twice daily nizatidine twice daily for 2 weeks. The full-analysis set analysis encompassed 239 patients (rebamipide/nizatidine, = 121; nizatidine, = 118), while the per-protocol analysis included 218 patients ( = 110 108). Post-treatment assessments comprised primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary (erosion and edema cure rates, erythema improvement rates, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms) endpoints. Furthermore, drug-related adverse effects were evaluated.
Primary efficacy assessment showed a statistically significant improvement rate in mucosal erosions in the combination group compared to the control group in the full-analysis set (rebamipide/nizatidine 62.0%, nizatidine 49.2%, = 0.046), with a similar trend noted in the per-protocol analysis (62.7% 50.0%, = 0.058). Both groups were effective in curing erosion and edema and improvement of bleeding, erythema, and gastrointestinal symptoms, whereas no inter-group differences were noted. When confined to the participants with gastritis symptoms, improvement of erosion was more optimal in the combination group (63.0% 49.5%, = 0.046). No adverse events related to the drugs were observed.
Rebamipide/nizatidine combination is effective in treatment of erosive gastritis.
对于胃炎的治疗,黏膜保护剂瑞巴派特和胃酸抑制剂尼扎替丁通常单独使用。
比较瑞巴派特缓释片(瑞巴派特150毫克)与阿克(尼扎替丁150毫克)联合治疗与单独使用阿克治疗糜烂性胃炎的疗效。
本开放标签、多中心、随机、4期临床试验共纳入260例经内镜确诊为糜烂性胃炎的患者,将他们分为两组:瑞巴派特/尼扎替丁联合组每日两次,尼扎替丁组每日两次,共治疗2周。全分析集分析包括239例患者(瑞巴派特/尼扎替丁组,n = 121;尼扎替丁组,n = 118),而符合方案分析包括218例患者(n = 110和108)。治疗后评估包括主要终点(糜烂改善率)和次要终点(糜烂和水肿治愈率、红斑改善率、出血情况及胃肠道症状)。此外,还评估了药物相关不良反应。
主要疗效评估显示,在全分析集中,联合组黏膜糜烂的改善率与对照组相比有统计学意义(瑞巴派特/尼扎替丁组为62.0%,尼扎替丁组为49.2%,P = 0.046),在符合方案分析中也有类似趋势(62.7%对50.0%,P = 0.058)。两组在治愈糜烂和水肿以及改善出血、红斑和胃肠道症状方面均有效,但组间无差异。在有胃炎症状的参与者中,联合组糜烂的改善更为显著(63.0%对49.5%,P = 0.046)。未观察到与药物相关的不良事件。
瑞巴派特/尼扎替丁联合治疗糜烂性胃炎有效。