Choi Yoon Jin, Lee Dong Ho, Choi Myung Gyu, Lee Sung Joon, Kim Sung Kook, Song Geun Am, Rhee Poong Lyul, Jung Hwoon Yong, Kang Dae Hwan, Lee Yong Chan, Lee Si Hyung, Choi Suck Chei, Shim Ki Nam, Seol Sang Yong, Moon Jeong Seop, Shin Yong Woon, Kim Hyun Soo, Lee Soo Teik, Cho Jin Woong, Choi Eun Kwang, Lee Oh Young, Jang Jin Seok
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1807-1813. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1807.
This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.4% (95% confidence interval, -9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of -14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670).
本研究比较了DA - 9601(韩国首尔东国制薬株式会社)及其新制剂DA - 5204(东国制薬株式会社)治疗糜烂性胃炎的疗效。这项III期随机、多中心、双盲、非劣效性试验将434例经内镜证实有胃黏膜糜烂的患者随机分为两组:DA - 9601每日3次或DA - 5204每日2次,疗程2周。最终分析纳入421例患者(DA - 5204组209例;DA - 9601组212例)。治疗后通过内镜评估主要终点(有效胃糜烂愈合率)和次要终点(内镜下糜烂治愈率及胃肠道[GI]症状缓解情况)。还比较了包括GI症状在内的药物相关不良事件(AE)。在第2周时,DA - 5204组和DA - 9601组的胃愈合率分别为42.1%(88/209)和42.5%(90/212)。两组之间的差异为 - 0.4%(95%置信区间, - 9.8%至9.1%),高于非劣效性界值 - 14%。两组的胃糜烂治愈率均为37.3%。DA - 5204组和DA - 9601组的GI症状改善率分别为40.4%和40.8%。在两个次要终点方面,两组之间均无统计学显著差异。DA - 5204组有18例(8.4%)患者报告了AE,DA - 9601组有19例(8.8%)。两组的AE发生率无差异。未发生严重AE或药物不良反应(ADR)。这些结果表明DA - 5204相对于DA - 9601具有非劣效性。DA - 5204在治疗糜烂性胃炎方面与DA - 9601同样有效。在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的随机临床试验(NCT02282670)。