Yusuf Fami Zekeriya, Kebede Tesfaye, Abera Michael Teklehaimanot, Bedane Alemayehu, Getachew Assefa, Abrar Semira
Adama Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Medical College, Department of Radiology, Adama, Ethiopia.
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024 Oct;34(Spec Iss 1):17-22. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.4S.
Cervical cancer remains a significant challenge in developing countries, with many patients diagnosed at advanced stages. The clinical staging of cervical cancer is guided by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) guidelines, while computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer valuable supplemental information. This study aimed to evaluate the initial clinical and imaging stages of cervical cancer and to assess the agreement between these staging methods.
A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 115 newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients at Tikur-Anbessa Specialized Hospital from September 1, 2022, to February 30, 2023. Clinical staging was performed for all patients, with CT staging for 107 and MRI staging for 34. Data were extracted from the hospital's central databases and analyzed using SPSS version 27. Descriptive and reliability analyses were conducted, with statistical significance set at a p-value of <0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.
At diagnosis, 61 patients (53%) presented with advanced clinical stages (III-IV). CT imaging indicated advanced stages in 85 patients (73.9%), while MRI was performed on 34 patients. Agreement between clinical and CT-based staging was poor (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.171, p = 0.016), while agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging was moderate (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.418, p = 0.007).
Newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients exhibit a high prevalence of advanced-stage disease. There is poor agreement between clinical and CT-based cervical cancer staging, contrasted with moderate agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging.
在发展中国家,宫颈癌仍然是一项重大挑战,许多患者在晚期才被诊断出来。宫颈癌的临床分期遵循国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)指南,而计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)提供了有价值的补充信息。本研究旨在评估宫颈癌的初始临床和影像分期,并评估这些分期方法之间的一致性。
进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了2022年9月1日至2023年2月28日在提库尔-安贝萨专科医院新诊断的115例宫颈癌患者。对所有患者进行临床分期,其中107例进行CT分期,34例进行MRI分期。数据从医院的中央数据库中提取,并使用SPSS 27版进行分析。进行了描述性和可靠性分析,统计学显著性设定为p值<0.05和95%置信区间。
诊断时,61例患者(53%)处于晚期临床分期(III-IV期)。CT影像显示85例患者(73.9%)处于晚期,而34例患者进行了MRI检查。临床分期与基于CT的分期之间的一致性较差(加权Cohen's kappa = 0.171,p = 0.016),而临床分期与基于MRI的分期之间的一致性为中等(加权Cohen's kappa = 0.418,p = 0.007)。
新诊断的宫颈癌患者中晚期疾病的患病率较高。临床分期与基于CT的宫颈癌分期之间的一致性较差,而临床分期与基于MRI的分期之间的一致性为中等。