Suppr超能文献

根治性手术后,病理分期为II-IVa期的食管鳞状细胞癌患者接受术后辅助免疫治疗并不能提高无病复发率。

Postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy for pathological stage II-IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery does not improve disease-free recurrence rates.

作者信息

Xie Xihao, Zhang Hai, He Haiquan, Wu Bomeng, Chen Ying, Lin Wanli, Feng Qingyi, Chen Qunqing

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Gaozhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 13;11:1517001. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1517001. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Postoperative adjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) primarily includes chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. The survival benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapy for R0-resected ESCC remain controversial. Immunotherapy is being gradually applied perioperatively for esophageal cancer, but the efficacy of postoperative immunotherapy in ESCC is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative immunotherapy for esophageal cancer. Toward this goal, we explored the differences between postoperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer at Gaozhou People's Hospital between January 2020 and August 2022 and received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the adjuvant treatment regimens: postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) and postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (aICT) groups. Data on baseline characteristics, surgical-related indicators, adverse event rates during adjuvant therapy, and 2-year postoperative follow-up were collected for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included: 36 and 40 patients in the aICT and aCT groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. During the adjuvant treatment period, the incidence of hypothyroidism was significantly higher in the aICT group than in the aCT group (25.0% vs. 2.5%,  = 0.007). During the 2-year follow-up, local and recurrence rates were 17.5 and 12.5% in the aCT group and 13.9 and 5.6% in the aICT group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( = 0.489).

CONCLUSION

For patients with pathologically confirmed locally advanced ESCC after surgery, postoperative immunotherapy did not confer better disease-free recurrence rates compared to postoperative adjuvant therapy. Nonetheless, with research advancements, the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of ESCC is likely to expand, offering new hope for these patients.

摘要

背景/目的:食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的术后辅助治疗主要包括化疗和放化疗。R0切除的ESCC术后辅助治疗的生存获益仍存在争议。免疫治疗正逐渐在食管癌围手术期应用,但ESCC术后免疫治疗的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估食管癌术后免疫治疗的有效性。为实现这一目标,我们探讨了术后免疫治疗联合化疗与单纯术后辅助化疗之间的差异。

方法

本回顾性研究评估了2020年1月至2022年8月在高州人民医院接受食管癌根治性手术并接受术后辅助治疗的患者。根据辅助治疗方案将患者分为两组:术后辅助化疗(aCT)组和术后辅助免疫治疗联合化疗(aICT)组。收集两组患者的基线特征、手术相关指标、辅助治疗期间的不良事件发生率以及术后2年随访数据。

结果

共纳入76例患者:aICT组和aCT组分别为36例和40例。两组基线数据无显著差异。在辅助治疗期间,aICT组甲状腺功能减退的发生率显著高于aCT组(25.0%对2.5%,P = 0.007)。在2年随访期间,aCT组局部复发率和远处复发率分别为17.5%和12.5%,aICT组分别为13.9%和5.6%,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.489)。

结论

对于术后病理证实为局部晚期ESCC的患者,与术后辅助治疗相比,术后免疫治疗并未带来更好的无病复发率。尽管如此,随着研究的进展,免疫治疗在ESCC治疗中的作用可能会扩大,为这些患者带来新的希望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772f/11671493/1cf207749bbf/fmed-11-1517001-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验