Rosenbaum Alyssa A, Murphy Claire M, Wszelaki Annette L, Hamilton Alexis M, Rideout Steven L, Strawn Laura K
Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
School of Food Science, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, Washington, USA.
J Food Prot. 2025 Feb 3;88(2):100444. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100444. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
Ground covers are used in produce production to enhance plant growth and control diseases and pests. While various factors are considered when selecting commercial ground covers, food safety, particularly the survival of foodborne pathogens, is often overlooked. This study aimed to assess the survival of Salmonella on different ground covers, including biodegradable mulch, landscape fabric, and plastic mulch. New rolls of each ground cover were cut to fit a 100 × 15 mm petri dish and spot inoculated with a seven-strain Salmonella cocktail at approximately 6 log CFU/cm. The inoculated coupons were stored in a climate-controlled chamber (23°C, 55% relative humidity) and sampled at 0, 0.06 (1.5 h), 0.17 (4 h), 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 30, 60, 90, and 140 days postinoculation (dpi). If counts dropped below the detection limit (<0.12 log CFU/cm), enrichments were performed following the Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual Salmonella protocol. Salmonella survived 140 dpi on all tested ground covers, with reductions >5 log CFU/cm. Survival rates at 140 dpi were highest on landscape fabric (83%, 25/30) followed by plastic mulch (50%, 15/30) and biodegradable mulch (13%, 4/30) coupons (p < 0.05). During the first 30 dpi, biodegradable mulch exhibited the smallest reduction in Salmonella (2.47 ± 0.26 log CFU/cm), compared to landscape fabric (3.07 ± 0.30 log CFU/cm) and plastic mulch (3.86 ± 0.72 log CFU/cm). After 60 dpi, Salmonella reductions stabilized across all materials (∼4 log CFU/cm) and by 90 dpi, no significant differences were observed between ground cover types (p > 0.05). Although Salmonella survival varied among ground covers in the short-term (0-30 dpi), a >5 log CFU/cm reduction of Salmonella was observed among all materials by 140 dpi. Findings suggest that ground cover material influences Salmonella survival and should be factored into food safety risk management strategies, especially when ground covers are reused.
地被植物用于农产品生产中,以促进植物生长并控制病虫害。在选择商用的地被植物时,虽然会考虑各种因素,但食品安全,尤其是食源性病原体的存活情况,却常常被忽视。本研究旨在评估沙门氏菌在不同地被植物上的存活情况,这些地被植物包括可生物降解的地膜、景观织物和塑料地膜。将每种地被植物的新卷材裁剪成适合100×15毫米培养皿的尺寸,并接种约6 log CFU/厘米的七菌株沙门氏菌混合菌液。接种后的试片存放在气候控制室(23°C,相对湿度55%)中,并在接种后0、0.06(1.5小时)、0.17(4小时)、1、2、3、5、7、30、60、90和140天进行采样。如果菌数降至检测限以下(<0.12 log CFU/厘米),则按照美国食品药品监督管理局《细菌学分析手册沙门氏菌检测规程》进行增菌培养。沙门氏菌在所有测试的地被植物上均存活至接种后140天,菌数减少>5 log CFU/厘米。接种后140天,景观织物上的存活率最高(83%,25/30),其次是塑料地膜(50%,15/30)和可生物降解地膜(13%,4/30)试片(p<0.05)。在接种后的前30天内,与景观织物(3.07±0.30 log CFU/厘米)和塑料地膜(3.86±0.72 log CFU/厘米)相比,可生物降解地膜上沙门氏菌的减少量最小(2.47±0.26 log CFU/厘米)。接种后60天,所有材料上沙门氏菌的减少量趋于稳定(约4 log CFU/厘米),到接种后90天,不同地被植物类型之间未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。虽然短期内(0-30天)沙门氏菌在不同地被植物上的存活情况有所不同,但到接种后140天,所有材料上的沙门氏菌数量均减少>5 log CFU/厘米。研究结果表明,地被植物材料会影响沙门氏菌的存活,应将其纳入食品安全风险管理策略中,尤其是在地被植物重复使用时。