Van Allan Richard J, Smouse H Bob, McWilliams Richard G, Brown Jennifer A, Kaufman John A, Segbefia Edem, Feezor Robert J
Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Apr;36(4):583-593.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.12.586. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
To report 2-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm study designed to further assess the safety and effectiveness of the Celect and Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filters.
The Cook Inferior Vena Cava Filter (CIVC) study enrolled patients requiring temporary or permanent inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of technical placement success and 12-month freedom from new symptomatic PE while a filter was indwelling. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of 12-month freedom from major adverse events. The primary endpoints were assessed for the Celect stratum, and secondary endpoints and secondary measures were assessed for the Celect stratum and Günther Tulip stratum. Follow-up was through 2 years or 1 month following retrieval.
Between 2014 and 2017, 473 patients (57.3% male; mean age, 61.1 years [SD ± 16.1]) were enrolled at 28 institutions: 324 in the Celect stratum and 149 in the Günther Tulip stratum. Filters were primarily placed for current deep vein thrombosis (48.4%) and/or current PE (20.7%). The primary effectiveness endpoint rate was 97.8%. The protocol analysis yielded a primary safety rate of 81.5% (P = .369); however, the post hoc analysis resulted in a primary safety rate of 86.7% (P = .001). The rate of successful filter retrieval was 94.9%. Only 2 patients had symptomatic filter leg interactions with the IVC. One death was adjudicated as device-/procedure-related.
CIVC study results support the safety and effectiveness of the Celect and Günther Tulip filters for the prevention of PE.
报告一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机、单臂研究的2年结果,该研究旨在进一步评估Celect和Günther Tulip下腔静脉滤器的安全性和有效性。
Cook下腔静脉滤器(CIVC)研究纳入了需要临时或永久性放置下腔静脉(IVC)滤器以预防肺栓塞(PE)的患者。主要有效性终点是技术放置成功率以及滤器留置期间12个月无新的症状性PE的发生率。主要安全性终点是12个月无重大不良事件的发生率。对Celect组评估主要终点,对Celect组和Günther Tulip组评估次要终点和次要指标。随访至取出滤器后2年或1个月。
2014年至2017年期间,28家机构共纳入473例患者(男性占57.3%;平均年龄61.1岁[标准差±16.1]):Celect组324例,Günther Tulip组149例。滤器主要用于当前的深静脉血栓形成(48.4%)和/或当前的PE(20.7%)。主要有效性终点发生率为97.8%。方案分析得出主要安全率为81.5%(P = 0.369);然而,事后分析得出主要安全率为86.7%(P = 0.001)。滤器成功取出率为94.9%。只有2例患者出现滤器与IVC的有症状的腿部相互作用。1例死亡判定与器械/手术相关。
CIVC研究结果支持Celect和Günther Tulip滤器预防PE的安全性和有效性。