Shi Bo, Xie Wenjuan, Kai Jia, Li Lijun, Sun Lin
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shani Medical University, No. 29, Double Tower Street, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030012, China.
Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08233-z.
This study aims to evaluate the optimal dose of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) for reducing blood loss in spinal surgery.
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library database from inception until November 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) incorporating diverse TXA dosing regimens for spinal surgery were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was employed to determine ranking order. R software with gemtc package was used for all analyses, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05.
Twenty-four RCTs were considered eligible and finally included. All TXA treatments demonstrated superior efficacy compared to the placebo, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). SUCRA values indicated that Treatment I (100 mg/kg + 10 mg.kg/h) claimed the top rank (SUCRA, 80.3%), followed by Treatment F (15 mg/kg + 2 mg.kg/h) in second place (SUCRA, 76.7%), and Treatment E (10 mg/kg + 2 mg.kg/h) in third place (SUCRA, 75.2%). Conversely, the placebo ranked the lowest (SUCRA, 0.3%). Additionally, Treatment I (100 mg/kg + 10 mg.kg/h) held the top rank (SUCRA, 95.6%), followed by Treatment N (30 mg/kg + 10 mg.kg/h) in second place (SUCRA, 81.0%), and Treatment K (15 mg/kg + 6 mg.kg/h) in third place (SUCRA, 74.8%). Importantly, no statistically significant differences were observed between any TXA treatments and the placebo concerning the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (P > 0.05).
This network meta-analysis underscores that intravenous TXA is associated with decreased overall blood loss in multilevel spine surgery. Notably, the highest dose in this network meta-analysis (100 mg/kg + 10 mg.kg/h) emerged as the only regimen demonstrating significant benefits in pairwise comparisons with other TXA doses. Although this regimen did not significantly increase DVT risk, careful consideration of safety data for higher doses remains essential.
本研究旨在评估静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)减少脊柱手术失血的最佳剂量。
从数据库创建至2023年11月,在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行系统检索。纳入了采用不同TXA给药方案的脊柱手术随机对照试验(RCT)。采用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)分析来确定排序顺序。所有分析均使用带有gemtc包的R软件,显著性阈值设定为P < 0.05。
24项RCT被认为符合纳入标准并最终被纳入。与安慰剂相比,所有TXA治疗均显示出更好的疗效,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。SUCRA值表明,治疗I(100mg/kg + 10mg·kg/h)排名第一(SUCRA,80.3%),其次是治疗F(15mg/kg + 2mg·kg/h),排名第二(SUCRA,76.7%),治疗E(10mg/kg + 2mg·kg/h)排名第三(SUCRA,75.2%)。相反,安慰剂排名最低(SUCRA,0.3%)。此外,治疗I(100mg/kg + 10mg·kg/h)排名第一(SUCRA,95.6%),其次是治疗N(30mg/kg + 10mg·kg/h),排名第二(SUCRA,81.0%),治疗K(15mg/kg + 6mg·kg/h)排名第三(SUCRA,74.8%)。重要的是,在深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的发生率方面,任何TXA治疗与安慰剂之间均未观察到统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。
这项网状Meta分析强调,静脉注射TXA与多级脊柱手术中总体失血量减少相关。值得注意的是,该网状Meta分析中的最高剂量(100mg/kg + 10mg·kg/h)是唯一在与其他TXA剂量的成对比较中显示出显著益处的方案。虽然该方案未显著增加DVT风险,但对更高剂量的安全性数据仍需谨慎考虑。