• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国新冠疫情期间老年疗养院居民家庭照顾者的照顾观念类型

Types of caregiving perceptions of family caregivers of elderly nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.

作者信息

Kim Ji-Hyang, Han Suk-Jung

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.

College of Nursing, Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 30;23(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02593-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02593-6
PMID:39736734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11686974/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This exploratory study applied Q methodology to identify the types of family caregivers of older adults in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic based on their perceptions of the caregiving role and explore each type's characteristics.

METHODS

Q statements were derived from in-depth interviews and a review of prior research. Q sorting was conducted using 39 P samples on a nine-point scale to determine Q distributions according to the degree of subjective agreeableness for each statement. In-depth interviews were conducted to determine why the subjects rated statements on either extreme.

RESULTS

Four types of family caregivers were identified as a result of an analysis using the PC QUANAL program: caregiving-positive type (type I), caregiving-ambivalent type (type II), nursing home dependent type (type III), and caregiving conflict burnout type (type IV).

CONCLUSION

The study results can help develop interventions and strategies based on perceptions of caregiving and their associated characteristics to provide psychological support to family members of older adult care home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the following measures are recommended: continuous follow-up research on specific measures facilitating communication between nursing home staff and family caregivers in the event of a pandemic; development of tools for measuring burnout risk among family caregivers and practical interventions for those at high risk; efforts to improve the image of older adult care homes and change the conventional perceptions of caregiving.

摘要

背景

本探索性研究应用Q方法,根据对护理角色的认知,识别新冠疫情期间养老院老年居民家庭照护者的类型,并探究每种类型的特征。

方法

Q陈述源自深入访谈和对先前研究的回顾。使用39个P样本进行九点量表Q分类,以根据每条陈述的主观认同程度确定Q分布。进行深入访谈以确定受试者对极端陈述评分的原因。

结果

使用PC QUANAL程序分析后,识别出四种类型的家庭照护者:积极照护型(I型)、矛盾照护型(II型)、依赖养老院型(III型)和照护冲突倦怠型(IV型)。

结论

研究结果有助于基于对照护的认知及其相关特征制定干预措施和策略,在新冠疫情期间为养老院老年居民的家庭成员提供心理支持。因此,建议采取以下措施:对疫情期间促进养老院工作人员与家庭照护者沟通的具体措施进行持续跟踪研究;开发测量家庭照护者倦怠风险的工具以及针对高风险人群的实际干预措施;努力改善养老院在老年人中的形象并改变传统的照护观念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ce/11686974/db70af9efe07/12912_2024_2593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ce/11686974/a0d9f6181ead/12912_2024_2593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ce/11686974/db70af9efe07/12912_2024_2593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ce/11686974/a0d9f6181ead/12912_2024_2593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ce/11686974/db70af9efe07/12912_2024_2593_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Types of caregiving perceptions of family caregivers of elderly nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间老年疗养院居民家庭照顾者的照顾观念类型
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 30;23(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02593-6.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
3
Outcomes of family involvement in care intervention for caregivers of individuals with dementia.家庭参与痴呆症患者照护者护理干预的效果
Nurs Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;53(2):76-86. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200403000-00003.
4
Seizing possibilities for positive family caregiving in nursing homes.把握养老院中积极家庭照护的可能性。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1479-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01844.x.
5
"Let me touch him": Perceptions and experiences of family caregivers of nursing home residents during the COVID-19 outbreak in Israel.“让我摸摸他”:以色列 COVID-19 疫情期间养老院居民家庭护理者的看法和体验。
J Aging Stud. 2023 Mar;64:101115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101115. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Types of Empathy Among Certified Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia.老年痴呆症患者认证护理人员的同理心类型
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Sep 13;16:2715-2731. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S417315. eCollection 2023.
7
Measuring positive caregiving experiences in family caregivers of nursing home residents: A comparison of the Positive Experiences Scale, Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument, and Positive Aspects of Caregiving questionnaire.测量养老院居民家庭照顾者积极照顾体验:积极体验量表、阿尔茨海默病护理增益量表和照顾积极方面问卷的比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):636-643. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14210. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
9
Challenges and guidance for implementing social distancing for COVID-19 in care homes: a mixed methods rapid review.实施 COVID-19 养老院社交隔离措施的挑战和指导:混合方法快速综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Nov;12(45):1-164. doi: 10.3310/YNTW4569.
10
Caregivers' experiences of a home support program after the hospital discharge of an older family member: a qualitative analysis.老年家庭成员出院后家庭支持项目中照顾者的经历:一项定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4042-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Guilt, tears and burnout-Impact of UK care home restrictions on the mental well-being of staff, families and residents.内疚、眼泪和倦怠——英国养老院限制对员工、家属和居民心理健康的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jul;78(7):2191-2202. doi: 10.1111/jan.15181. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
2
A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.Q 方法论在医疗保健研究中的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7.
3
Efficiency and effectiveness of geriatric drug infographics: A randomized, controlled trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2355-2358. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17193. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
4
The impact of Covid-19-related distancing on the well-being of nursing home residents and their family members: a qualitative study.新冠疫情相关社交距离措施对养老院居民及其家庭成员幸福感的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Nov;3:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100031. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study.新冠疫情相关社会支持服务关闭对痴呆症患者和无薪照护者的影响:一项定性研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jul;25(7):1281-1288. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1822292. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Effect Evaluation of the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) System on the Health Care of the Elderly: A Review.长期护理保险(LTCI)系统对老年人医疗保健的效果评估:一项综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Aug 25;13:863-875. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S270454. eCollection 2020.
7
Dementia Caregiving During the "Stay-at-Home" Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行“居家”阶段的痴呆症护理。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Mar 14;76(4):e241-e245. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa129.
8
Allowing Visitors Back in the Nursing Home During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Dutch National Study Into First Experiences and Impact on Well-Being.在 COVID-19 危机期间允许访客返回养老院:一项荷兰全国性研究,探讨了最初的经验及其对幸福感的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):900-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Family Satisfaction With Nursing Home Care: Findings and Implications From Two State Comparison.家庭对养老院护理的满意度:两项州对比研究的结果与启示。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Apr;39(4):385-392. doi: 10.1177/0733464818790381. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
From Family Involvement to Family Inclusion in Nursing Home Settings: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.从养老院的“家庭参与”到“家庭融入”:批判性综合解释。
J Fam Nurs. 2018 Feb;24(1):60-85. doi: 10.1177/1074840718754314. Epub 2018 Feb 19.