Kawazu Suguru, Amitani Marie, Suzuki Hajime, Amitani Haruka, Monuki Takako, Wada Midori, Toyohira Satomi, Hamada Kazumasa, Yamamoto Takako, Yoshimura Takuya, Mizuma Kimiko, Nishida Yuko, Watanabe Hiroko, Hirose Masayuki, Tagawa Koshiro, Ota Keiko, Asakawa Akihiro, Owaki Tetsuhiro
Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Education Center for Doctors in Remote Islands and Rural Areas, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 11;18:1468729. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468729. eCollection 2024.
School refusal is one of the serious problems with children's mental health, and various studies have examined its prevalence and factors among students. Although many studies suggested that anxiety and depression are deeply associated with school refusal, there is little agreement as to effective interventions. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mindfulness yoga intervention in children with school refusal.
This study is a multicenter, exploratory, open cluster-randomized controlled trial. 43 participants aged 10-15 years with school refusal were randomly assigned to a non-yoga group with treatment as usual (TAU) which includes cognitive behavioral therapy based on self-monitoring, or a yoga group (4-week mindfulness yoga program provided by video sessions + TAU). The primary outcome was symptoms of anxiety evaluated by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale-Children (SCAS-C). Participants were assessed in four time periods: a 2-week baseline (Day -14), a baseline (Day 1), a post-test after 4 weeks of treatment (Day 29), and an 8-week follow-up (Day 85). Statistical analysis was conducted by a linear mixed effect model using SAS version 9.4.
43 participants were included in the Full-analysis set (FAS) (21 in the mindfulness yoga group and 22 in the non-yoga group). The estimates of SCAS-C at post-test adjusted for baseline values in each treatment group were 39.9 in the mindfulness yoga group and 39.4 in the non-yoga group. The between-group difference for the estimates was 0.4 (80%CI -4.8 to -5.6, = 0.54), which indicated mindfulness yoga program has no significant effect on anxiety compared with TAU. However, on an exploratory analysis of the subscale of SCAS-C, significant improvement was observed on the Physical Injury Fears subscale. The pulse rate was significantly lower in the yoga group compared to the non-yoga group.
This study indicated the safety of a mindfulness yoga intervention for children with school refusal, but the effectiveness of the intervention for anxiety was limited. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of yoga and how it can best be integrated with other therapies.
学校拒学是儿童心理健康方面的严重问题之一,多项研究已对其在学生中的患病率及相关因素进行了考察。尽管许多研究表明焦虑和抑郁与学校拒学密切相关,但对于有效干预措施却几乎没有共识。本文旨在评估正念瑜伽干预对学校拒学儿童的疗效和安全性。
本研究是一项多中心、探索性、开放整群随机对照试验。43名年龄在10至15岁的学校拒学参与者被随机分配到接受常规治疗(TAU)的非瑜伽组,其中包括基于自我监测的认知行为疗法,或瑜伽组(通过视频课程提供为期4周的正念瑜伽课程+TAU)。主要结局是通过斯宾斯儿童焦虑量表-儿童版(SCAS-C)评估的焦虑症状。参与者在四个时间段接受评估:为期2周的基线期(第-14天)、基线期(第1天)、治疗4周后的测试后(第29天)以及8周随访期(第85天)。使用SAS 9.4版本通过线性混合效应模型进行统计分析。
43名参与者被纳入全分析集(FAS)(正念瑜伽组21名,非瑜伽组22名)。各治疗组经基线值调整后的测试后SCAS-C估计值,正念瑜伽组为39.9,非瑜伽组为39.4。估计值的组间差异为0.4(80%CI -4.8至-5.6,P = 0.54),这表明与TAU相比,正念瑜伽课程对焦虑没有显著影响。然而,在对SCAS-C子量表的探索性分析中,在身体伤害恐惧子量表上观察到了显著改善。与非瑜伽组相比,瑜伽组的脉搏率显著更低。
本研究表明正念瑜伽干预对学校拒学儿童具有安全性,但该干预对焦虑的有效性有限。需要进一步研究以确定瑜伽的长期效果以及如何能最好地将其与其他疗法相结合。