• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术与腹腔镜急诊及急性护理手术:重新定义创新(RLEARN):一级创伤中心机器人胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的可行性和益处

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Emergency and Acute Care Surgery: Redefining Novelty (RLEARN): feasibility and benefit of robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a level 1 trauma center.

作者信息

Klein Joshua, Lemma Mekedes, Prabhakaran Kartik, Rafieezadeh Aryan, Kirsch Jordan Michael, Rodriguez Gabriel, Blazar Ilyse, Jose Anna, Zangbar Bardiya

机构信息

Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Dec 27;9(1):e001522. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522
PMID:39737144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683923/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the setting of a level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of our hospital data (2021-2024) on patients who underwent LC or RC. Using a previously validated intraoperative grading system, four grades of cholecystitis were defined as mild (A), moderate (B), severe (C), and extreme (D). Outcomes were operative times and rates of conversion to open surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 260 patients (n=130 RC and n=130 LC) were included. Patients were primarily female (69.2%), with mean age of 47±18.3 years. The majority of cases had grade B cholecystitis (41.2%). Patients undergoing RC had lower operative times compared with LC in grade B (101.87±17.54 vs 114.96±29.44 min, p=0.003) and grade C (134.68±26.97 vs 152.06±31.3 min, p=0.038). Conversion rate to open cholecystectomy were similar in both groups (p=0.19).

CONCLUSION

RC had similar results as LC in terms of operative time and in fact has significantly lower operative time in patients with grade B and grade C cholecystitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective study.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较在一级创伤中心环境下机器人胆囊切除术(RC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的手术结果。

方法

我们对本院2021年至2024年接受LC或RC手术的患者数据进行了回顾性研究。使用先前验证的术中分级系统,将胆囊炎分为四个等级:轻度(A)、中度(B)、重度(C)和极重度(D)。观察指标为手术时间和转为开放手术的比例。

结果

共纳入260例患者(RC组130例,LC组[130例)。患者以女性为主(69.2%),平均年龄47±18.3岁。大多数病例为B级胆囊炎(41.2%)。B级胆囊炎患者中,RC组的手术时间低于LC组(101.87±17.54分钟对114.96±29.44分钟,p = 0.003);C级胆囊炎患者中,RC组的手术时间也低于LC组(134.68±26.97分钟对152.06±31.3分钟,p = 0.038)。两组转为开腹胆囊切除术的比例相似(p = 0.19)。

结论

在手术时间方面,RC与LC结果相似,实际上B级和C级胆囊炎患者中,RC的手术时间显著更短。

证据级别

三级——回顾性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7077/11683923/bdc65ae9c397/tsaco-9-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7077/11683923/a55480f05a56/tsaco-9-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7077/11683923/bdc65ae9c397/tsaco-9-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7077/11683923/a55480f05a56/tsaco-9-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7077/11683923/bdc65ae9c397/tsaco-9-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Emergency and Acute Care Surgery: Redefining Novelty (RLEARN): feasibility and benefit of robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a level 1 trauma center.机器人手术与腹腔镜急诊及急性护理手术:重新定义创新(RLEARN):一级创伤中心机器人胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的可行性和益处
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Dec 27;9(1):e001522. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522. eCollection 2024.
2
A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.机器人胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较:手术结果与成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1436-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5134-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Cholecystectomies Based on the Parkland Grading Scale.基于帕克兰分级量表的腹腔镜与机器人胆囊切除术的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68523. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in Veteran patients.退伍军人患者良性胆囊疾病的机器人和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):849-857. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01183-3. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review.在一个年轻的机器人手术项目的学术中心进行机器人胆囊切除术的可行性:一项回顾性队列研究与伞状评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01824-x.
6
Comparative analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗小儿患者的对比分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1876-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
Comparing Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效比较
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00026. Epub 2025 May 7.
8
Short-term outcomes and costs analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a retrospective single-center analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的短期结果和成本分析 - 回顾性单中心分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 8;408(1):299. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03037-6.
9
Robotic cholecystectomy using Senhance robotic platform versus laparoscopic conventional cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis.使用 Senhance 机器人平台行机器人胆囊切除术与腹腔镜常规胆囊切除术的比较:倾向评分分析。
Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Jun;122(3):160-163. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1881332. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Followed by Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Grade II Acute Cholecystitis According to Tokyo Guidelines TG18.根据东京指南TG18,II级急性胆囊炎患者早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造瘘术继以延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Apr;35(4):277-285. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0332. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Current evidence and reported experiences for robot-assisted emergency general surgery: systematic review.机器人辅助急诊普通外科手术的当前证据及报告经验:系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 30;19(1):534. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02696-5.
2
Robotic-assisted versus conventional/single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统/单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗良性胆囊疾病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 23;104(21):e42493. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042493.
3
Optimizing robotic utilization: the role of preoperative grading scales in prioritizing robotic surgery for minimally invasive cholecystectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人技术在微创外科时代的急诊普通外科手术中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):493-499. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.
2
Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较安全性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389.
3
Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and preoperative predictive factors.困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术及术前预测因素。
优化机器人手术的使用:术前分级量表在微创胆囊切除术机器人手术优先级排序中的作用。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 4;10(1):e001713. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001713. eCollection 2025.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81938-6.
4
A prospective cohort study for prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一项预测困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 1;60:728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.082. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.2020 年世界急诊外科学会更新了急性结石性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
6
An Update on Technical Aspects of Cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术技术要点更新。
Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;99(2):245-258. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
A comparison of cholecystitis grading scales.胆囊炎分级量表的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Mar;86(3):471-478. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002125.
8
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗良性胆囊疾病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4377-4392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6295-9. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era?机器人技术在胆囊切除术中的新兴作用:新时代的曙光?
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Feb;7(1):21-28. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.03.01.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的诊断标准与严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9.