Ibrahim Youssef, Rahman Mahin Azim, Pickering Oliver, Cole Kirsty, Pucher Philip H
Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Department of Pharmacy and Biosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 30;19(1):534. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02696-5.
Emergency general surgery (EGS) represents a significant global healthcare burden. While minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopy have become standard in elective and emergency settings, the adoption of robot-assisted approaches in EGS (REGS) has been more gradual. The expanding interest in REGS necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of its current role, outcomes, cost implications, and implementation strategies. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2025 for studies reporting on robot-assisted surgery in emergency general surgical settings. The following domains were assessed: Safety, clinical outcomes, cost, and experiential data, with quality assessment via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Twenty studies involving over 5 million patients were included. The majority were retrospective cohort studies from Western centres, primarily the United States. Common procedures included cholecystectomy, colectomy, and hernia repair. Robotic approaches demonstrated low conversion rates, comparable or shorter lengths of stay, and similar or reduced complication and ICU admission rates versus laparoscopic or open techniques. However, operative times were generally longer, and hospital costs were consistently higher. Implementation strategies across four studies emphasized staged training, multidisciplinary involvement, and institutional support. Study quality ranged from moderate to good, though outcome reporting and cost analyses were inconsistent. Robot-assisted EGS appears feasible and safe in selected patients within institutions equipped with appropriate expertise and infrastructure. While early outcomes are encouraging, widespread adoption is challenged by higher costs and limited high-quality evidence. Future prospective studies, robust cost-effectiveness analyses, and structured implementation models are essential to define the long-term role of robotics in emergency surgical care.
急诊普通外科(EGS)是一项重大的全球医疗负担。虽然腹腔镜等微创技术已成为择期和急诊手术的标准术式,但机器人辅助手术在急诊普通外科(REGS)中的应用则更为渐进。对REGS兴趣的不断增加,有必要对其当前作用、疗效、成本影响及实施策略进行全面评估。我们按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统综述。截至2025年1月,在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中检索了关于急诊普通外科手术中机器人辅助手术的研究报告。评估了以下领域:安全性、临床疗效、成本和经验数据,并通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。纳入了20项涉及超过500万患者的研究。大多数是来自西方中心(主要是美国)的回顾性队列研究。常见手术包括胆囊切除术、结肠切除术和疝修补术。与腹腔镜或开放手术相比,机器人手术显示出较低的中转率、相当或更短的住院时间,以及相似或更低的并发症和重症监护病房(ICU)入住率。然而,手术时间通常更长,医院成本始终更高。四项研究中的实施策略强调分阶段培训、多学科参与和机构支持。研究质量从中等到良好不等,不过疗效报告和成本分析并不一致。在具备适当专业知识和基础设施的机构中,机器人辅助EGS对部分患者似乎是可行且安全的。虽然早期疗效令人鼓舞,但成本较高和高质量证据有限对其广泛应用构成了挑战。未来的前瞻性研究、有力的成本效益分析和结构化的实施模式对于确定机器人技术在急诊外科护理中的长期作用至关重要。