• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估股总动脉内膜切除术联合股深动脉成形术的疗效:单中心三年观察视角

Evaluating the Efficacy of Common Femoral Endarterectomy With Profundoplasty: A Three-Year Single-Center Perspective.

作者信息

Hamad Hisham Abdelrheem Abdelrhman, Abd Allah Reyad, Jararaa Sohaib, Elshikhawoda Mohamed S M, Omer Omer Kamal, Zafar Muhammad Awais, Ibrahim Yara, Okaz Mahmoud, Mohammed Mohammed Jibreel, Barakat Tarig

机构信息

Surgery, University of Bahri, Khartoum, SDN.

Plastic Surgery, Khartoum North Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):e74809. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74809. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.74809
PMID:39737276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to synthesise recent findings on the outcomes of common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) with profundoplasty, evaluating the efficacy, complications, and predictors of long-term success in patients undergoing this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a descriptive retrospective study assessing the outcomes of CFE with profundoplasty. All patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) who attended and underwent CFE with profundoplasty with or without iliac intervention at Glan Clwyd Hospital (Wales, United Kingdom) were studied. We excluded the patients who had the CFE as part of bypass surgery.

RESULTS

In a period of three years, 77 patients were included. Forty-six (59.7%) of them were male, and 31 (40.3%) of them were female. The mean age was 73.3 ± 7.8 years (standard deviation). Regarding the comorbidity, hypertension and smoking were recorded for most of the patients, while the other comorbidities were less frequent. The majority of the patients are presented with rest pain 70.1% (n = 54), while the remainder has both rest pain and tissue loss. Forty patients (51.9%) had CFE as part of the hybrid operation with iliac angioplasty; however, only 37 patients (48.1%) had CFE. The most reported complications postoperatively were groin infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and thrombosis, with less reporting for the rest of the complications. The limb salvage rate was 74% (n = 57); moreover, the mean primary patency rate was 10.7 + 8.4 months SD.

CONCLUSION

The CFE is a feasible operation, either isolated or in conjunction with iliac angioplasty, with a satisfactory patency rate. It can be offered to the high-risk group of patients. However, they are going to need a rigorous follow-up to avoid or minimise postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在综合近期有关股总动脉内膜切除术(CFE)联合股深动脉成形术的研究结果,评估接受该手术患者的疗效、并发症及长期成功的预测因素。

患者与方法

这是一项描述性回顾性研究,评估CFE联合股深动脉成形术的结果。对所有在英国威尔士格兰克莱德医院接受CFE联合股深动脉成形术且有或无髂动脉干预的慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者进行了研究。我们排除了作为旁路手术一部分进行CFE的患者。

结果

在三年期间,共纳入77例患者。其中46例(59.7%)为男性,31例(40.3%)为女性。平均年龄为73.3±7.8岁(标准差)。关于合并症,大多数患者记录有高血压和吸烟,而其他合并症较少见。大多数患者表现为静息痛,占70.1%(n = 54),其余患者既有静息痛又有组织缺失。40例(51.9%)患者的CFE是髂动脉血管成形术混合手术的一部分;然而,只有37例(48.1%)患者单独进行了CFE。术后最常报告的并发症是腹股沟感染、医院获得性肺炎和血栓形成,其他并发症报告较少。肢体挽救率为74%(n = 57);此外,平均初次通畅率为10.7 + 8.4个月(标准差)。

结论

CFE无论是单独进行还是与髂动脉血管成形术联合进行,都是一种可行的手术,通畅率令人满意。它可以提供给高危患者群体。然而,他们需要严格的随访以避免或最小化术后并发症。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of Common Femoral Endarterectomy With Profundoplasty: A Three-Year Single-Center Perspective.评估股总动脉内膜切除术联合股深动脉成形术的疗效:单中心三年观察视角
Cureus. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):e74809. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74809. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
The Role of the Profundoplasty in the Modern Management of Patient with Peripheral Vascular Disease.股深动脉成形术在周围血管疾病患者现代治疗中的作用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;45:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
The natural history of isolated common femoral endarterectomy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.孤立性股总动脉内膜切除术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的自然史。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1537-1542.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.050. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Common femoral artery endarterectomy for lower-extremity ischemia: evaluating the need for additional distal limb revascularization.下肢缺血的股总动脉内膜切除术:评估额外进行远端肢体血运重建的必要性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;26(7):946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.02.014.
5
Clinical outcomes from profundoplasty performed as a sole procedure for revascularization in critically ischaemic limbs.单纯行深筋膜切开术治疗严重缺血肢体的临床转归。
Vascular. 2021 Jun;29(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/1708538120963901. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
Iliac artery stenting combined with open femoral endarterectomy is as effective as open surgical reconstruction for severe iliac and common femoral occlusive disease.髂动脉支架置入联合开放股动脉内膜切除术治疗严重髂股动脉闭塞性疾病的效果与开放手术重建相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.027. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
7
[Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].[决定主-双股动脉旁路移植术远期通畅率的因素]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):24-35.
8
Common femoral artery endarterectomy in the age of endovascular therapy.血管内治疗时代的股总动脉内膜切除术
Vascular. 2018 Dec;26(6):581-590. doi: 10.1177/1708538118772682. Epub 2018 May 14.
9
Bioabsorbable stent implantation vs. common femoral artery endarterectomy: early results of a randomized trial.生物可吸收支架植入术与股总动脉内膜切除术:一项随机试验的早期结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Aug;21(4):493-502. doi: 10.1583/14-4699R.1.
10
A national Vascular Quality Initiative database comparison of hybrid and open repair for aortoiliac-femoral occlusive disease.国家血管质量倡议数据库比较杂交手术与开放手术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):199-205.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.098. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of common femoral artery steno-occlusive disease: a comprehensive review of anatomical and hemodynamic considerations.治疗股总动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病:解剖和血流动力学考虑的综合综述。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2024 Aug;65(4):313-323. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13073-X. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.
3
Common femoral artery endarterectomy in the age of endovascular therapy.血管内治疗时代的股总动脉内膜切除术
Vascular. 2018 Dec;26(6):581-590. doi: 10.1177/1708538118772682. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
Results of common femoral artery thromboendarterectomy evaluation of a traditional surgical management in the endovascular era.股总动脉血栓内膜切除术:血管腔内治疗时代传统外科治疗的评估结果
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.036.
5
Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease.踝臂指数用于诊断下肢外周动脉疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 14;9(9):CD010680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010680.pub2.
6
Clinical Outcome of Surgical Endarterectomy for Common Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease.股总动脉闭塞性疾病外科内膜切除术的临床结果
Circ J. 2016;80(4):964-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1177. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
A pooled analysis of common femoral and profunda femoris endovascular interventions.股总动脉和股深动脉血管内介入治疗的汇总分析。
Vascular. 2016 Aug;24(4):404-13. doi: 10.1177/1708538115604929. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Retrograde thrombendarterectomy vs. ilio-femoral bypass in unilateral iliac TASC C and D lesions.逆行血栓内膜切除术与髂股旁路移植术治疗单侧髂动脉TASC C和D级病变的比较
Vasa. 2015 May;44(3):211-9. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000417.
9
Postoperative complications after common femoral endarterectomy.股总动脉内膜剥脱术后的术后并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1489-94.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Assessing the perioperative safety of common femoral endarterectomy in the endovascular era.评估血管腔内治疗时代股总动脉内膜切除术的围手术期安全性。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014 Jan;48(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/1538574413508827. Epub 2013 Oct 18.