• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于系统高估调整的双阶段优化器应用于生物标志物选择的多目标遗传算法

Dual-stage optimizer for systematic overestimation adjustment applied to multi-objective genetic algorithms for biomarker selection.

作者信息

Cattelani Luca, Fortino Vittorio

机构信息

School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Brief Bioinform. 2024 Nov 22;26(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae674.

DOI:10.1093/bib/bbae674
PMID:39737563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684899/
Abstract

The selection of biomarker panels in omics data, challenged by numerous molecular features and limited samples, often requires the use of machine learning methods paired with wrapper feature selection techniques, like genetic algorithms. They test various feature sets-potential biomarker solutions-to fine-tune a machine learning model's performance for supervised tasks, such as classifying cancer subtypes. This optimization process is undertaken using validation sets to evaluate and identify the most effective feature combinations. Evaluations have performance estimation error, measurable as discrepancy between validation and test set performance, and when the selection involves many models the best ones are almost certainly overestimated. This issue is also relevant in a multi-objective feature selection process where various characteristics of the biomarker panels are optimized, such as predictive performances and feature set size. Methods have been proposed to reduce the overestimation after a model has already been selected in single-objective problems, but no algorithm existed capable of reducing the overestimation during the optimization, improving model selection, or applied in the more general multi-objective domain. We propose Dual-stage Optimizer for Systematic overestimation Adjustment in Multi-Objective problems (DOSA-MO), a novel multi-objective optimization wrapper algorithm that learns how the original estimation, its variance, and the feature set size of the solutions predict the overestimation. DOSA-MO adjusts the expectation of the performance during the optimization, improving the composition of the solution set. We verify that DOSA-MO improves the performance of a state-of-the-art genetic algorithm on left-out or external sample sets, when predicting cancer subtypes and/or patient overall survival, using three transcriptomics datasets for kidney and breast cancer.

摘要

在组学数据中选择生物标志物面板,受到众多分子特征和有限样本的挑战,通常需要使用机器学习方法并结合包装特征选择技术,如遗传算法。它们测试各种特征集——潜在的生物标志物解决方案——以微调机器学习模型在监督任务中的性能,例如对癌症亚型进行分类。这个优化过程是使用验证集来评估和识别最有效的特征组合。评估存在性能估计误差,可通过验证集和测试集性能之间的差异来衡量,并且当选择涉及许多模型时,最佳模型几乎肯定被高估。这个问题在多目标特征选择过程中也很重要,在该过程中生物标志物面板的各种特征被优化,如预测性能和特征集大小。已经提出了一些方法来减少单目标问题中模型选择后的高估,但不存在能够在优化过程中减少高估、改进模型选择或应用于更一般的多目标领域的算法。我们提出了多目标问题中系统高估调整的双阶段优化器(DOSA-MO),这是一种新颖的多目标优化包装算法,它了解原始估计、其方差以及解决方案的特征集大小如何预测高估。DOSA-MO在优化过程中调整性能期望,改善解集的组成。我们使用三个肾脏和乳腺癌的转录组学数据集验证了,在预测癌症亚型和/或患者总生存期时,DOSA-MO在留出或外部样本集上提高了一种先进遗传算法的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/66ac1af340bd/bbae674f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/da7359c7663f/bbae674f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/22fbc42e7b87/bbae674f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/3b300a51f148/bbae674f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/194742a54aaf/bbae674f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/b9377be5eaf8/bbae674f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/66ac1af340bd/bbae674f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/da7359c7663f/bbae674f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/22fbc42e7b87/bbae674f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/3b300a51f148/bbae674f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/194742a54aaf/bbae674f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/b9377be5eaf8/bbae674f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8ee/11684899/66ac1af340bd/bbae674f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Dual-stage optimizer for systematic overestimation adjustment applied to multi-objective genetic algorithms for biomarker selection.用于系统高估调整的双阶段优化器应用于生物标志物选择的多目标遗传算法
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Nov 22;26(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae674.
2
A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Benchmarking Multi-Objective Feature Selection in Omics-Based Biomarker Discovery.基于组学的生物标志物发现中多目标特征选择基准测试的综合评估框架
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2024 Nov-Dec;21(6):2432-2446. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2024.3480150. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Triple and quadruple optimization for feature selection in cancer biomarker discovery.癌症生物标志物发现中的特征选择的三重和四重优化。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Nov;159:104736. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104736. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
4
C-HMOSHSSA: Gene selection for cancer classification using multi-objective meta-heuristic and machine learning methods.C-HMOSHSSA:使用多目标元启发式和机器学习方法进行癌症分类的基因选择。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Sep;178:219-235. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.029. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
Robust biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma from high-throughput data by multiple feature selection methods.通过多种特征选择方法从高通量数据中发现用于肝细胞癌的稳健生物标志物。
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Aug 25;14(Suppl 1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00957-4.
6
NNBGWO-BRCA marker: Neural Network and binary grey wolf optimization based Breast cancer biomarker discovery framework using multi-omics dataset.基于神经网络和二进制灰狼优化的乳腺癌生物标志物发现框架,利用多组学数据集。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Sep;254:108291. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108291. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
7
Comparison of five supervised feature selection algorithms leading to top features and gene signatures from multi-omics data in cancer.比较五种监督特征选择算法,这些算法可从癌症的多组学数据中得到顶级特征和基因特征。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Apr 28;23(Suppl 3):153. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04678-y.
8
Upper-Limb Motion Recognition Based on Hybrid Feature Selection: Algorithm Development and Validation.基于混合特征选择的上肢运动识别:算法开发与验证。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):e24402. doi: 10.2196/24402.
9
An improved binary particle swarm optimization algorithm for clinical cancer biomarker identification in microarray data.一种用于微阵列数据中临床癌症生物标志物识别的改进二元粒子群优化算法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Feb;244:107987. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107987. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Multi-scale supervised clustering-based feature selection for tumor classification and identification of biomarkers and targets on genomic data.基于多尺度监督聚类的特征选择在肿瘤分类和基因组数据的生物标志物和靶标鉴定中的应用。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Sep 22;21(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07038-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications and challenges of biomarker-based predictive models in proactive health management.基于生物标志物的预测模型在主动健康管理中的应用与挑战
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;13:1633487. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1633487. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Benchmarking Multi-Objective Feature Selection in Omics-Based Biomarker Discovery.基于组学的生物标志物发现中多目标特征选择基准测试的综合评估框架
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2024 Nov-Dec;21(6):2432-2446. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2024.3480150. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Triple and quadruple optimization for feature selection in cancer biomarker discovery.癌症生物标志物发现中的特征选择的三重和四重优化。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Nov;159:104736. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104736. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Improved NSGA-II algorithms for multi-objective biomarker discovery.
改进的 NSGA-II 算法用于多目标生物标志物发现。
Bioinformatics. 2022 Sep 16;38(Suppl_2):ii20-ii26. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac463.
4
Just Add Data: automated predictive modeling for knowledge discovery and feature selection.只需添加数据:用于知识发现和特征选择的自动预测建模
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Jun 16;6(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00274-8.
5
Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.用于从组学数据中定义生物标志物的数据分析方法。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022 Jan;414(1):235-250. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03813-7. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
Machine-learning-driven biomarker discovery for the discrimination between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.基于机器学习的生物标志物发现用于区分变应性接触性皮炎和刺激性接触性皮炎。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 29;117(52):33474-33485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009192117. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative.基于RNA测序的分类器对五种传统乳腺癌生物标志物预测的临床价值:来自基于人群的多中心瑞典癌症基因组分析网络-乳腺癌倡议的报告
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Mar 9;2. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00135. eCollection 2018.
8
Feature set optimization in biomarker discovery from genome-scale data.从基因组规模数据中发现生物标志物的特征集优化。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Jun 1;36(11):3393-3400. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa144.
9
MaNGA: a novel multi-niche multi-objective genetic algorithm for QSAR modelling.MaNGA:一种用于 QSAR 建模的新型多目标多领域遗传算法。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Jan 1;36(1):145-153. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz521.
10
The Cancer Genome Atlas: Creating Lasting Value beyond Its Data.癌症基因组图谱:在其数据之外创造持久价值。
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):283-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.042.