Moitra Panchali, Nemani Janvi, Madre Saba, Madan Jagmeet
Department of Postgraduate Programs and Research, Sir Vithaldas Thackersey College of Home Science (Empowered Autonomous Status), SNDT Women's University, Juhu Tara Road, Santacruz West, Mumbai, 400049, Maharashtra, India.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82080-9.
This study aimed to develop and test the psychometric properties of a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB) related to nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition (PN) in dietetic students and professionals in India. A literature review, six focus group discussions (n = 37), and nine in-depth interviews guided initial item generation. The face, item, and scale content validity indices were calculated and a cross-sectional sample (n = 297) examined the item difficulty (IDI), item discrimination (DI), and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was estimated in a sub-sample (n = 64) and confirmatory factor analysis method (CFA) using model fit indices - factor loadings, Tucker Lewis Fit Index, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation established construct validity. The IDI ranged from 0.60 to 0.72 and the mean Cronbach α was 0.82. The CFA results presented four constructs - 1) knowledge and understanding of nutrigenomics, 2) attitude, and willingness to learn nutrigenomics, 3) behaviors toward gene-based dietary advice, 4) training and confidence to practice PN. The intraclass correlation coefficients for knowledge, attitude, behavior, and training domains were 0.74, 0.83, 0.72, and 0.81. The psychometric evaluation indicated that the 45-item KAB_PN is a valid and reliable instrument to assess students' and dietitians' knowledge and perspectives toward nutrigenomics and PN.
本研究旨在开发并测试一份问卷的心理测量特性,该问卷用于评估印度营养学专业学生和专业人士与营养基因组学和个性化营养(PN)相关的知识、态度和行为(KAB)。通过文献综述、六次焦点小组讨论(n = 37)和九次深入访谈指导初始项目生成。计算了表面效度、项目效度和量表内容效度指数,并通过一个横断面样本(n = 297)检验了项目难度(IDI)、项目区分度(DI)和内部一致性。在一个子样本(n = 64)中估计了重测信度,并使用模型拟合指数——因子载荷、塔克·刘易斯拟合指数和近似均方根误差,通过验证性因子分析方法(CFA)建立了结构效度。IDI范围为0.60至0.72,平均克朗巴哈α系数为0.82。CFA结果呈现出四个结构——1)营养基因组学的知识与理解,2)对营养基因组学的态度和学习意愿,3)基于基因的饮食建议的行为,4)实施PN的培训和信心。知识、态度、行为和培训领域的组内相关系数分别为0.74、0.83、0.72和0.81。心理测量评估表明,这份包含45个条目的KAB_PN问卷是评估学生和营养师对营养基因组学和PN的知识及观点的有效且可靠的工具。