• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膀胱切除术后回肠代膀胱造口旁疝的初次及复发性处理:一项为期10年的单中心经验

Initial and recurrent management of parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a 10 year single-center experience.

作者信息

Roussel Edouard, Dupuis Hugo, Grosjean Julien, Cornu Jean-Nicolas, Khalil Haitham

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France.

Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen Cedex, F-76031, France.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Dec 30;29(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03207-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03207-5
PMID:39738628
Abstract

PURPOSE

The management of parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion is challenging due to its specific nature and a high recurrence rate, yet is poorly described.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched the clinical data warehouse of our center for patients who had primary parastomal hernia repair following cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. The primary endpoint was recurrence of parastomal hernia; secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and surgical management of recurrences.

RESULTS

From January 1st 2012 to January 1st 2022, 35 patients were included in the study, 13 patients (37.1%) were operated with the Keyhole technique and 22 patients (62.9%) with the Sugarbaker technique. The median follow-up was 24 months. The main complication was urinary tract infection, in 6 patients (17.4%). Postoperative complications were severe in 4 patients (11.4%), 3 (8.6%) for prosthesis extraction due to infection. Ninety-day mortality was null. Eight patients (22.9%) had a symptomatic recurrence of parastomal hernia leading to a second surgery, 4 patients (30.7%) in the Keyhole group and 4 patients (18.2%) in the Sugarbaker group. Surgical management of recurrences involved repair without synthetic mesh in 4 patients (50%) due to difficult adhesiolysis, leading to a third surgery for 3 patients (37.5%).

CONCLUSION

The high rates of recurrence observed with the Keyhole technique, in particular, but also with the Sugarbaker technique, suggest that these techniques should no longer be used for the repair of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion. New preventive and curative approaches need to be explored to improve the surgical management of parastomal hernia.

摘要

目的

膀胱切除术后回肠代膀胱造口旁疝的管理具有挑战性,因其性质特殊且复发率高,但相关描述较少。

方法

我们回顾性检索了本中心临床数据仓库中膀胱切除术后回肠代膀胱造口旁疝初次修复患者的资料。主要终点是造口旁疝复发;次要终点是术后并发症及复发的手术处理。

结果

2012年1月1日至2022年1月1日,35例患者纳入研究,13例(37.1%)采用钥匙孔技术手术,22例(62.9%)采用舒格贝克技术手术。中位随访时间为24个月。主要并发症为尿路感染,共6例(17.4%)。4例(11.4%)患者术后出现严重并发症,3例(8.6%)因感染取出假体。90天死亡率为零。8例(22.9%)患者出现有症状的造口旁疝复发并接受二次手术,钥匙孔组4例(30.7%),舒格贝克组4例(18.2%)。4例(50%)复发患者因粘连松解困难,手术处理时未使用合成补片修复,其中3例(37.5%)接受了第三次手术。

结论

特别是钥匙孔技术,以及舒格贝克技术,观察到的高复发率表明,这些技术不应再用于回肠代膀胱尿流改道后造口旁疝的修复。需要探索新的预防和治疗方法,以改善造口旁疝的手术管理。

相似文献

1
Initial and recurrent management of parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a 10 year single-center experience.膀胱切除术后回肠代膀胱造口旁疝的初次及复发性处理:一项为期10年的单中心经验
Hernia. 2024 Dec 30;29(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03207-5.
2
Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝修补中匙孔技术与Sugarbaker技术的比较:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2021 May 3;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01228-w.
3
Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: a single-center experience.腹腔镜下 Sugarbaker 修补术治疗根治性膀胱切除术和回肠导管术后的造口旁疝:单中心经验。
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02553-6.
4
Repair of parastomal hernia after Bricker procedure: retrospective consecutive experience of a tertiary center.Bricker 手术后造口旁疝的修补:三级中心的回顾性连续经验。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):823-830. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02940-7. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
5
Parastomal hernias after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: surgical treatment and the use of prophylactic mesh: a systematic review.膀胱切除和回肠导管尿流改道术后的造口旁疝:手术治疗和预防性使用网片:系统评价。
BMC Surg. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01509-y.
6
Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study.机器人辅助回肠造口旁疝修补术在回肠造口患者中的应用:单中心队列研究的短期结果。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2245-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03153-2. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
Perioperative and extended outcomes of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair following cystectomy and ileal conduit.膀胱切除和回肠造口术后行造口旁疝修补术患者的围手术期和长期结局。
World J Urol. 2024 Aug 12;42(1):482. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05123-w.
8
Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion.根治性膀胱切除术和回肠导管转流术后的造口旁疝。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):240-8. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.240. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
9
Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放式经肌后入路 Sugarbaker 法与经皮锁孔网片置入术治疗造口旁疝的随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):982-989. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1686.
10
How-I-do-it: minimally invasive repair of ileal conduit parastomal hernias.方法:微创修复回肠造口旁疝。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 May;407(3):1291-1301. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02393-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid Open Anterior and Laparoscopic Repair Using Self-Gripping Mesh for Parastomal Hernia Following Ileal Conduit With Extensive Intra-abdominal Adhesions: A Case Report.使用自固定补片对伴有广泛腹腔内粘连的回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝进行开放前路与腹腔镜联合修补:一例报告
Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82500. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82500. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Comparison of different mesh placement techniques for parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.用于造口旁疝修补的不同补片放置技术的比较:一项更新的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Hernia. 2025 Apr 12;29(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03330-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Repair of parastomal hernias with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R and IPST.应用腹腔内漏斗状补片(IPST-R 和 IPST)修复造口旁疝。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69667-y.
2
Three-year follow-up of the grip concept: an open, prospective, observational registry study on biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair for complex incisional hernias.握力概念的 3 年随访:一项针对复杂切口疝的生物力学计算腹壁修复的开放性、前瞻性、观察性注册研究。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):913-924. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03064-2. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit decreases the risk of parastomal hernia: A single-center, randomized clinical trial.
Comment to: Initial and recurrent management of parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion.
对《膀胱切除术后回肠代膀胱造口旁疝的初次及复发处理》的评论
Hernia. 2025 Feb 7;29(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03284-0.
回肠膀胱术的腹膜外造口可降低造口旁疝的风险:一项单中心随机临床试验。
Cell Rep Med. 2024 Jan 16;5(1):101343. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101343. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Open retromuscular keyhole compared with Sugarbaker mesh for parastomal hernia repair: Early results of a randomized clinical trial.开放式肌后钥匙孔与 Sugarbaker 网片修补术治疗造口旁疝的比较:一项随机临床试验的早期结果。
Surgery. 2024 Mar;175(3):813-821. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.046. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Parastomal Hernia Repair.造口旁疝修补术
Surg Clin North Am. 2023 Oct;103(5):993-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 May 12.
6
Prophylactic Mesh Placement With Ileal Conduit: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.预防性放置回肠导管网片:成本效益分析。
Urology. 2023 Jul;177:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.041. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Surgical treatment strategy for recurrent parastomal hernia: Experiences from 17 cases.复发性造口旁疝的手术治疗策略:17例经验
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 2;9:928743. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.928743. eCollection 2022.
8
Modified keyhole plus technique with partial release of posterior rectus sheath for parastomal hernia repair after ileal conduit.改良经脐部小切口加部分后鞘松解技术修补回肠膀胱术后造口旁疝
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):850-853. doi: 10.1111/ases.13093. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
9
A semi-Markov model comparing the lifetime cost-effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing end colostomy creation for rectal cancer.一个半马尔可夫模型,用于比较网状预防措施在直肠癌行结肠造口术患者中预防造口旁疝的终生成本效益。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2967-2979. doi: 10.1111/codi.15848. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝修补中匙孔技术与Sugarbaker技术的比较:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2021 May 3;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01228-w.