Suppr超能文献

静脉分水岭分析定位法与计算机断层扫描引导下经皮定位法在检测不可触及的周围型肺结节中的应用:一项非劣效性的真实世界研究

Vein watershed analysis locational method versus computed tomography-guided percutaneous localization for detecting non-palpable peripheral pulmonary nodules: a real-world study of non-inferiority.

作者信息

Huang Chen, Chen Zi-Hao, Peng Li-Shan, Zhang Jia-Tao, Lin Jun-Tao, Zhang Sheng, Yang Jie, Jiang Ben-Yuan, Yang Xue-Ning, Zhong Wen-Zhao, Nie Qiang

机构信息

Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae225.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, with the advancement of sublobar resection, a safe, painless method for locating peripheral pulmonary nodules was needed. Previously, an alternative method of arterial watershed localization was introduced to remedy the shortcomings of preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization or other methods for locating pulmonary nodules, but its technical limitations were discovered during clinical applications. Therefore, we developed a technique to localize non-subpleural nodules using basin analysis of the target vein and validated its feasibility and safety.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of surgical cases of pulmonary nodules smaller than 2 cm in our centre. The vein watershed locational method (V-WALM) was compared with CT-guided percutaneous puncture localization wedge dissection in terms of success rate, the mean duration of the operation, mean volume of intraoperative bleeding and median postoperative stay, mean postoperative drainage and mean drainage tube indwelling time.

RESULTS

V-WALM and CT-guided localization were used for localized resection of pulmonary nodules in 50 patients. The localization success rates were 94.0% for V-WALM and 90.0% for CT-guided localization, respectively, with no statistical difference noted. In addition, no statistical difference in patient population distribution between the 2 groups was noted. The operating time was 95.5 ± 26.4 min for V-WALM and 94.3 ± 37.5 min for CT-guided localization, with no statistical difference. Neither were there statistical differences in intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage and drainage tube indwelling time. The lymph node sampling rate of V-WALM was 48.0%, which was much higher than the 24% noted in the CT-guided localization group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that V-WALM is a safe and feasible intraoperative localization method for peripheral lung nodules. It provides a high-precision, fast and minimally invasive approach to intraoperative localization.

摘要

目的

近年来,随着肺段以下切除术的进展,需要一种安全、无痛的方法来定位周围型肺结节。此前,引入了一种动脉分水岭定位的替代方法来弥补术前计算机断层扫描(CT)引导定位或其他肺结节定位方法的不足,但在临床应用中发现了其技术局限性。因此,我们开发了一种利用目标静脉流域分析来定位非胸膜下结节的技术,并验证了其可行性和安全性。

方法

我们对本中心小于2 cm的肺结节手术病例进行了回顾性分析。将静脉分水岭定位法(V-WALM)与CT引导下经皮穿刺定位楔形切除术在成功率、平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、术后中位住院时间、平均术后引流量和平均引流管留置时间方面进行比较。

结果

50例患者分别采用V-WALM和CT引导定位进行肺结节局部切除。V-WALM和CT引导定位的定位成功率分别为94.0%和90.0%,差异无统计学意义。此外,两组患者人群分布差异无统计学意义。V-WALM的手术时间为95.5±26.4分钟,CT引导定位为94.3±37.5分钟,差异无统计学意义。术中出血量、术后引流量和引流管留置时间差异也无统计学意义。V-WALM的淋巴结采样率为48.0%,远高于CT引导定位组(24%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,V-WALM是一种安全可行的术中定位周围型肺结节的方法。它为术中定位提供了一种高精度、快速且微创的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77b/11758505/a5ef9f822ba9/ivae225f3.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验