• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

育儿胜任感(PSoC)的纵向测量不变性:对其使用提出质疑的证据?

Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Parenting Sense of Competence (PSoC): Evidence to Question Its Use?

作者信息

Gridley Nicole, Mooney Kate, Blower Sarah, Melendez-Torres G J, Berry Vashti, Bywater Tracey

机构信息

Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University, England, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, England, UK.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jan;51(1):e70030. doi: 10.1111/cch.70030.

DOI:10.1111/cch.70030
PMID:39739339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684975/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the factor structure of the parenting sense of competence (PSoC), a measure of parenting self-efficacy, in a sample of parents recruited when their infants were under 2 months old. Due to the lack of longitudinal analysis of the PSoC's factor structure over time, the study sought to establish if the published two-factor structure was consistent over an 18-month period.

METHODS

Data collected from 536 parents who had participated in a randomised controlled trial of universal proportionate parenting support, delivered in five sites in England, were subject to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

CFA revealed that a three-factor model was the best fit for the data. Longitudinal measurement invariance testing examined the stability of the three-factor model across an 18-month period. The results suggest that while the PSoC appeared to have configural variance, the metric and scalar variance were not supported. PSoC may be unstable across time and might be unreliable as a measure of parenting competence in parents of infants.

CONCLUSION

These findings are particularly salient for researchers and clinicians who are utilising the PSoC as a measure of change in routine practice or as part of evaluations of interventions. Further investigation of individual items is needed to refine the PSoC and improve its psychometric validity. Additional analyses are also needed to establish the invariance of the measure across different groups (age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic status).

摘要

背景

本研究调查了育儿能力感(PSoC)的因子结构,PSoC是一种育儿自我效能感的测量指标,研究对象为婴儿2个月大时招募的父母样本。由于缺乏对PSoC因子结构随时间的纵向分析,该研究旨在确定已发表的两因子结构在18个月期间是否一致。

方法

从536名参与了在英格兰五个地点开展的普遍适度育儿支持随机对照试验的父母那里收集的数据,进行了验证性因子分析(CFA)。

结果

CFA显示三因子模型最适合这些数据。纵向测量不变性检验考察了三因子模型在18个月期间的稳定性。结果表明,虽然PSoC似乎具有构型方差,但度量和标量方差未得到支持。PSoC可能随时间不稳定,作为婴儿父母育儿能力的一种测量指标可能不可靠。

结论

这些发现对于将PSoC用作常规实践变化的测量指标或作为干预评估一部分的研究人员和临床医生尤为重要。需要对各个项目进行进一步调查,以完善PSoC并提高其心理测量效度。还需要进行额外分析,以确定该测量指标在不同群体(年龄、性别、种族和社会经济地位)中的不变性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b27/11684975/932e09a862e7/CCH-51-e70030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b27/11684975/c9d5f1a7bf42/CCH-51-e70030-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b27/11684975/932e09a862e7/CCH-51-e70030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b27/11684975/c9d5f1a7bf42/CCH-51-e70030-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b27/11684975/932e09a862e7/CCH-51-e70030-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Parenting Sense of Competence (PSoC): Evidence to Question Its Use?育儿胜任感(PSoC)的纵向测量不变性:对其使用提出质疑的证据?
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jan;51(1):e70030. doi: 10.1111/cch.70030.
2
Measurement of Parenting Self-efficacy Among Female HIV-Affected Caregivers in Uganda.乌干达女性 HIV 感染者照料者养育自我效能感的测量。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Mar;24(3):319-327. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02855-9.
3
Parenting Sense of Competence: Psychometrics and Invariance among a Community and an At-Risk Samples of Portuguese Parents.育儿胜任感:葡萄牙父母社区样本和高危样本中的心理测量学及不变性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1):15. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010015.
4
Evaluation of the Polish version of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale in parents of typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders.父母效能感量表波兰文版在典型发育儿童和自闭症谱系障碍儿童父母中的评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2022 May;48(3):443-454. doi: 10.1111/cch.12945. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
The Parenting Sense of Competence scale: Updating a classic.父母效能感量表:经典更新。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13173. doi: 10.1111/cch.13173. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
6
Validation of the parenting sense of competence scale in fathers: Thai version.父亲育儿能力感量表的效度验证:泰语版
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013 Sep;44(5):916-26.
7
Factor structure of the Parenting Sense of Competence scale using a normative sample.使用常模样本的育儿胜任感量表的因子结构。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Jan;35(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00867.x. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
8
Measurement invariance in the assessment of parenting practices: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States.父母教养实践评估中的测量不变性:中、美跨文化比较。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Sep;37(6):774-785. doi: 10.1037/fam0001099. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
[Reliability and validity test of Chinese version of the Karitane parenting confidence scale].[卡力坦尼育儿信心量表中文版的信效度检验]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 6;55(7):811-817. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20210530-00524.
10
[Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of parenting sense of competence scale in mothers of preschool children].[中文版育儿胜任感量表在学龄前儿童母亲中的信效度研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 18;53(3):479-484. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.007.

本文引用的文献

1
The Parenting Sense of Competence scale: Updating a classic.父母效能感量表:经典更新。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13173. doi: 10.1111/cch.13173. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
A randomized controlled trial of a proportionate universal parenting program delivery model (E-SEE Steps) to enhance child social-emotional wellbeing.一项比例普遍育儿计划实施模式(E-SEE 步骤)对增强儿童社会情感福祉的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265200. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychometric Properties of Parent Outcome Measures Used in RCTs of Antenatal and Early Years Parent Programs: A Systematic Review.
心理计量特性的父母结局测量用于 RCTs 的产前和早期年父母方案:系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep;22(3):367-387. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00276-2.
4
Enhancing Social-Emotional Health and Wellbeing in the Early Years (E-SEE): a study protocol of a community-based randomised controlled trial with process and economic evaluations of the incredible years infant and toddler parenting programmes, delivered in a proportionate universal model.增强幼儿期社会情感健康和福祉(E-SEE):一项基于社区的随机对照试验研究方案,对以均衡普及模式提供的难以置信的婴幼儿父母育儿计划进行了过程和经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e026906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026906.
5
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.检验有序分类测量数据的纵向测量不变性。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):486-506. doi: 10.1037/met0000075. Epub 2016 May 23.
7
A survey of parental self-efficacy experiences: maximising potential through health visiting and universal parenting support.父母自我效能感体验调查:通过健康访问和普遍育儿支持最大限度地发挥潜力。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3276-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04074.x.
8
Parenting self-efficacy, parenting stress and child behaviour before and after a parenting programme.育儿课程前后的育儿自我效能感、育儿压力与儿童行为
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012 Oct;13(4):364-72. doi: 10.1017/S1463423612000060. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Factor structure of the Parenting Sense of Competence scale using a normative sample.使用常模样本的育儿胜任感量表的因子结构。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Jan;35(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00867.x. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
10
Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review.父母自我效能感在亲子适应中的潜在作用:一项综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 May;25(3):341-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004.