Thakur Chirag, Mathew Joseph L, Saxena Akshay K, Angrup Archana, Samujh Ram
Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27465. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27465. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
To compare the efficacy and safety of administering six doses of intrapleural streptokinase (SK) versus the conventional three doses, in children with empyema.
In this open label, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, we enrolled 53 children with empyema, who received three doses of intrapleural SK. Thereafter, those without clinical improvement (n = 34) and those showing clinical improvement but having persistent pleural fluid width > 10 mm on chest ultrasonography (n = 13), were randomized to receive three additional doses of SK, or three doses of placebo (normal saline). The remaining 6 children improved clinically and radiologically, hence were not randomized. The outcomes recorded were cumulative volume of pleural fluid drained, total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, proportion of children with treatment failure requiring surgery, and adverse events. Spirometry, 6-min walk test, chest X-ray and ultrasonography were done 3 months following discharge. We analyzed by intention-to-treat.
The baseline characteristics of children who received six versus three doses SK were comparable. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative volume of fluid drained; median (IQR): 810.0 (330.0, 1630.0) [95% CI: 505, 1463] mL versus 530.0 (255.2, 1325.0) [95% CI: 325, 1131] mL, p 0.46. There were no significant inter-group differences in the total duration of intercostal drainage, time taken for clinical improvement, duration of hospitalization, treatment failure, surgical decortication and adverse events.
In children with empyema, intrapleural therapy with six doses of SK is not superior to three doses, although it is safe.
比较六剂胸膜腔内链激酶(SK)与传统三剂胸膜腔内链激酶用于脓胸患儿的疗效和安全性。
在这项开放标签、安慰剂对照的随机试验中,我们纳入了53例脓胸患儿,给予三剂胸膜腔内SK。此后,临床无改善的患儿(n = 34)以及临床有改善但胸部超声显示胸腔积液宽度持续>10 mm的患儿(n = 13),被随机分为再接受三剂SK或三剂安慰剂(生理盐水)。其余6例患儿临床和影像学均有改善,因此未参与随机分组。记录的结果包括胸腔引流液的累积量、肋间引流的总时长、临床改善所需时间、住院时长、需要手术治疗失败的患儿比例以及不良事件。出院3个月后进行肺活量测定、6分钟步行试验、胸部X线和超声检查。我们采用意向性分析。
接受六剂与三剂SK治疗的患儿基线特征具有可比性。引流液累积量无统计学显著差异;中位数(IQR):810.0(330.0,1630.0)[95%CI:505,1463]mL对530.0(255.2,1325.0)[95%CI:325,1131]mL,p = 0.46。肋间引流总时长、临床改善所需时间、住院时长、治疗失败、手术剥脱术和不良事件在组间无显著差异。
对于脓胸患儿,六剂胸膜腔内SK治疗虽安全,但并不优于三剂胸膜腔内SK治疗。