Singh Bisman, Mathew Joseph L, Jayashree Muralidharan, Saxena Akshay K, Ray Pallab
Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s12098-024-05405-6.
To compare six doses of intrapleural streptokinase (SK) vs. the conventional three doses in children with empyema.
In this randomized controlled trial, children with empyema received intrapleural streptokinase, either twice daily for 3 d (total 6 doses); or once daily for 3 d (total 3 doses). The outcomes assessed were treatment failure, volume of fluid drained, duration of fever, duration of respiratory distress, length of hospitalization, need for surgical decortication, adverse events and cost.
Thirty-six children were enrolled. Cumulative pleural pus drainage was significantly higher with six doses [median (IQR) 367 (266, 850) vs. 195 (142, 422) ml, p 0.02]. The mean (SD) durations of fever and respiratory distress, after completing intrapleural therapy were also shorter; 2.3 (0.8) vs. 5.7 (1.6) d, p 0.04; and 2.2 (0.9) vs. 6.3 (1.9) d, p 0.03 respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospitalization after completing therapy [median (IQR) 9 (6, 17) vs. 12 (4, 16) d], total duration of intercostal drainage [median (IQR) 13 (11, 21) vs. 12 (7, 19) d], treatment failure rate [4/16 (25%) vs. 7/16 (43.7%)], or need for surgical decortication [2/16 (16.2%) vs. 1/16 (6.2%)]. There were no significant adverse effects necessitating cessation or modification of therapy in either group. The cost of therapy was identical in both groups.
Six doses of intrapleural streptokinase appear superior to the conventional three doses in children with empyema, with comparable safety and cost.
比较六剂胸膜腔内链激酶(SK)与传统三剂对脓胸患儿的治疗效果。
在这项随机对照试验中,脓胸患儿接受胸膜腔内链激酶治疗,一组每日两次,共3天(共6剂);另一组每日一次,共3天(共3剂)。评估的结果包括治疗失败、引流量、发热持续时间、呼吸窘迫持续时间、住院时间、手术剥脱需求、不良事件和费用。
共纳入36名儿童。六剂组的累计胸膜脓液引流量显著更高[中位数(四分位间距)367(266,850)vs. 195(142,422)ml,p = 0.02]。完成胸膜腔内治疗后,发热和呼吸窘迫的平均(标准差)持续时间也更短;分别为2.3(0.8)天 vs. 5.7(1.6)天,p = 0.04;以及2.2(0.9)天 vs. 6.3(1.9)天,p = 0.03。然而,完成治疗后的住院时间[中位数(四分位间距)9(6,17)天 vs. 12(4,16)天]、肋间引流总持续时间[中位数(四分位间距)13(11,21)天 vs. 12(7,19)天]、治疗失败率[4/16(25%)vs. 7/
16(43.7%)]或手术剥脱需求[2/16(16.2%)vs. 1/16(6.2%)]均无统计学显著差异。两组均未出现需要停止或调整治疗的显著不良反应。两组的治疗费用相同。
对于脓胸患儿,六剂胸膜腔内链激酶似乎优于传统的三剂,安全性和成本相当。