Longo Paola, Bevione Francesco, Lacidogna Maria Carla, Lavalle Raffaele, Abbate Daga Giovanni, Preti Antonio
Eating Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Eating Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116346. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116346. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions can effectively treat eating disorders (EDs), but improvements are often short-term and modest. Neuromodulation, altering nerve activity through targeted neurological stimulation, is an emerging intervention in neuropsychiatric disorders. This meta-review synthesizes evidence on neuromodulatory techniques in ED patients, identifying research gaps and future directions.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched using relevant terms.
STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS: Only systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting on neuromodulatory techniques in ED patients were included. Three evaluators extracted data, resolving discrepancies with two experienced researchers. Study quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Defined outcomes and effect sizes were reported for systematic reviews, and pooled effect sizes and heterogeneity information for meta-analyses.
Eighteen systematic reviews (five meta-analyses) were included, with minimal primary study overlap (<5%). Most focused on anorexia nervosa (AN), some on treatment-resistant cases, and others on bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). The quality of most systematic reviews was critically low, and they often combined observational studies with randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed promising results in RCTs, managing binge eating and craving levels more effectively than body mass index in AN. Side effects included headaches, nausea, and drowsiness for rTMS and tDCS, and rare instances of seizures and infection with deep brain stimulation.
Neuromodulation holds promise for treating EDs. Future studies should prioritize RCTs, objective outcome measures, longer follow-up for stability assessment, and comprehensive adverse event monitoring.
心理社会干预和药物干预可以有效治疗饮食失调症(EDs),但改善效果往往是短期且有限的。神经调节通过有针对性的神经刺激改变神经活动,是神经精神疾病领域一种新兴的干预方法。本综述综合了饮食失调症患者神经调节技术的证据,找出研究空白并指明未来方向。
使用相关术语检索了PubMed/Medline、EMBASE和PsycINFO。
研究选择、数据提取与综合:仅纳入了报告饮食失调症患者神经调节技术的系统评价或荟萃分析。三名评估人员提取数据,与两名经验丰富的研究人员解决分歧。使用AMSTAR-2评估研究质量。对于系统评价,报告了定义的结果和效应量;对于荟萃分析,报告了合并效应量和异质性信息。
纳入了18项系统评价(5项荟萃分析),原始研究重叠极少(<5%)。大多数关注神经性厌食症(AN),一些关注难治性病例,其他关注神经性贪食症(BN)和暴饮暴食症(BED)。大多数系统评价的质量极低,它们经常将观察性研究与随机对照试验(RCT)相结合。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在RCT中显示出有前景的结果,在控制暴饮暴食和渴望程度方面比神经性厌食症患者的体重指数更有效。副作用包括rTMS和tDCS引起的头痛、恶心和嗜睡,以及深部脑刺激罕见的癫痫发作和感染病例。
神经调节在治疗饮食失调症方面具有前景。未来研究应优先进行随机对照试验、采用客观的结果测量方法、进行更长时间的随访以评估稳定性,并进行全面的不良事件监测。