Suppr超能文献

非侵入性脑刺激治疗食物成瘾、摄食和进食障碍:方法、发现和争议的综述。

Non-invasive brain stimulation for food cravings, consumption, and disorders of eating: A review of methods, findings and controversies.

机构信息

Prevention Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the state of the human research literature pertaining to the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) procedures for modulating food cravings, food consumption, and treating disorders of eating (i.e., obesity, bulimia nervosa, and anorexia nervosa).

METHODS

A narrative review of methods, empirical findings, and current areas of controversy. Both single-session experimental and multi-session therapeutic modalities are considered, separately for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) technologies.

RESULTS

Single-session studies involving NIBS report more consistent effects of rTMS than tDCS, but this advantage is more clear in relation to food cravings than actual food consumption. Multisession therapeutic approaches have been applied to both obesity and eating disorders. With respect to obesity, the three published (tDCS) and one ongoing trial (rTMS) have yielded promising though very preliminary findings. Application of multi-session NIBS (predominantly rTMS) to eating disorders has also yielded promising but ultimately inconclusive results, both in relation to bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. Findings regarding excitatory NIBS in the context of anorexia are more controversial, with evidence of improvement in affective functioning, but a trend of iatrogenic weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Excitatory NIBS-particularly rTMS-can reliably reduce food cravings in single and multi-session format. For multi-session treatment of clinical conditions, more studies are needed for both rTMS and tDCS, particularly in relation to obesity, bulimia, and binge eating disorder. Application of NIBS for anorexia is less clear at this point, and excitatory NIBS may be contraindicated on theoretical and empirical grounds.

摘要

目的

描述与使用非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)程序调节食物渴望、食物摄入以及治疗饮食障碍(即肥胖、神经性贪食症和神经性厌食症)相关的人类研究文献的状况。

方法

对方法、实证发现和当前争议领域进行叙述性综述。分别考虑单次和多次治疗模式,用于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)技术。

结果

单次 session 研究报告称,rTMS 比 tDCS 更能产生一致的效果,但这种优势在与食物渴望相关时更为明显,而不是实际的食物摄入。多 session 治疗方法已应用于肥胖和饮食障碍。关于肥胖,三项已发表(tDCS)和一项正在进行的试验(rTMS)得出了有希望但非常初步的结果。多 session NIBS(主要是 rTMS)在饮食障碍中的应用也产生了有希望但最终不确定的结果,无论是针对神经性贪食症还是暴食障碍。在厌食症背景下兴奋性 NIBS 的发现更具争议性,有证据表明情感功能得到改善,但存在医源性体重减轻的趋势。

结论

兴奋性 NIBS-特别是 rTMS-可以可靠地减少单次和多 session 格式中的食物渴望。对于临床疾病的多 session 治疗,rTMS 和 tDCS 都需要更多的研究,特别是在肥胖、贪食症和暴食障碍方面。在这一点上,NIBS 对厌食症的应用不太明确,并且兴奋性 NIBS 在理论和经验上可能是禁忌的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验