• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健筹资公平性:证据综述

Equity in healthcare financing: A review of evidence.

作者信息

Luyten Emilia, Tubeuf Sandy

机构信息

Université catholique de Louvain, Institute de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Saint Louis (IRIS), Faculté des sciences économiques, sociales, politiques et de la communication Saint-Louis (ESPB), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 43 B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.

Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES) - LIDAM, Faculté de Santé Publique, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30, Box B1.30.01 B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2025 Feb;152:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105218. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105218
PMID:39740647
Abstract

This review summarises empirical studies on the progressivity and redistributive effects of healthcare financing mechanisms. The evidence varies significantly across countries and financing sources. Tax-based systems exhibit high progressivity, as direct taxes contribute to a favourable redistribution toward low-income households, often offsetting the regressive nature of indirect taxes. Social insurance systems are found to be progressive but may be regressive in practice due to contribution ceilings and exemptions for high-income earners. This creates disparities where high-income taxpayers benefit from social protection while contributing less proportionally to their total income, limiting the overall positive redistributive effect on income inequalities. Most health systems with co-payments use flat rates rather than income-based rates, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals and potentially leading to catastrophic expenses. This review highlights a lack of recent research on healthcare financing in high-income countries, while recent studies in low- and middle-income countries align with commitment to deliver universal health coverage. Continuous analysis of the redistributive effects of the health system is essential to ensure that health financing systems not only fund healthcare effectively but also contribute to broader social equity goals.

摘要

本综述总结了关于医疗融资机制的累进性和再分配效应的实证研究。各国以及不同融资来源的证据差异显著。基于税收的体系具有高度累进性,因为直接税有助于向低收入家庭进行有利的再分配,通常抵消了间接税的累退性质。社会保险体系被认为具有累进性,但在实践中可能因缴费上限和高收入者豁免而具有累退性。这就造成了一种差异,即高收入纳税人从社会保护中受益,但其对总收入的贡献比例较低,限制了对收入不平等的总体正向再分配效应。大多数有共付额的卫生系统采用统一费率而非基于收入的费率,对低收入个人影响过大,并可能导致灾难性支出。本综述强调,高收入国家近期缺乏关于医疗融资的研究,而低收入和中等收入国家的近期研究与实现全民健康覆盖的承诺相一致。持续分析卫生系统的再分配效应对于确保卫生融资系统不仅能有效资助医疗保健,还能促进更广泛的社会公平目标至关重要。

相似文献

1
Equity in healthcare financing: A review of evidence.医疗保健筹资公平性:证据综述
Health Policy. 2025 Feb;152:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105218. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.广西全民健康覆盖后卫生筹资公平性研究:基于 2009-2013 年广西壮族自治区农村地区卫生支出比较的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 29;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0669-9.
3
Assessing income redistributive effect of health financing in Zambia.评估赞比亚卫生筹资的收入再分配效应。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Financing universal health coverage--effects of alternative tax structures on public health systems: cross-national modelling in 89 low-income and middle-income countries.全民健康覆盖的融资——替代税收结构对公共卫生系统的影响:89个低收入和中等收入国家的跨国建模
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):274-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60574-8. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Ten years of progress towards universal health coverage: has China achieved equitable healthcare financing?全民健康覆盖十年进展:中国实现公平医疗筹资了吗?
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003570.
6
The progressivity of health-care financing in Kenya.肯尼亚医疗保健筹资的累进性。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Oct;29(7):912-20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt073. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
7
The Case Against Labor-Tax-Financed Social Health Insurance For Low- And Low-Middle-Income Countries.对低收入和中低收入国家由劳动税资助的社会医疗保险的反对理由
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):892-897. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00874.
8
The Impact of Financing Health Services on Income Inequality in an Unequal Society: The Case of South Africa.卫生服务筹资对不平等社会中收入不平等的影响:以南非为例。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Sep;19(5):721-733. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00643-7. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Who pays for healthcare in Bangladesh? An analysis of progressivity in health systems financing.在孟加拉国,谁来支付医疗保健费用?卫生系统筹资公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 6;16(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0654-3.
10
An Alternative Approach to Decomposing the Redistributive Effect of Health Financing Between and Within Groups Using the Gini Index: The Case of Out-of-Pocket Payments in Nigeria.利用基尼指数分解卫生筹资在群体间和群体内的再分配效应的另一种方法:以尼日利亚自付费用为例。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Dec;18(6):747-757. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00520-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to International Universal Health Coverage Reforms: A Realist Review.国际全民健康覆盖改革的障碍与促进因素:一项现实主义综述
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8709. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8709. Epub 2025 May 19.