Suppr超能文献

医疗保健筹资公平性:证据综述

Equity in healthcare financing: A review of evidence.

作者信息

Luyten Emilia, Tubeuf Sandy

机构信息

Université catholique de Louvain, Institute de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Saint Louis (IRIS), Faculté des sciences économiques, sociales, politiques et de la communication Saint-Louis (ESPB), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 43 B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.

Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES) - LIDAM, Faculté de Santé Publique, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30, Box B1.30.01 B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2025 Feb;152:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105218. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

This review summarises empirical studies on the progressivity and redistributive effects of healthcare financing mechanisms. The evidence varies significantly across countries and financing sources. Tax-based systems exhibit high progressivity, as direct taxes contribute to a favourable redistribution toward low-income households, often offsetting the regressive nature of indirect taxes. Social insurance systems are found to be progressive but may be regressive in practice due to contribution ceilings and exemptions for high-income earners. This creates disparities where high-income taxpayers benefit from social protection while contributing less proportionally to their total income, limiting the overall positive redistributive effect on income inequalities. Most health systems with co-payments use flat rates rather than income-based rates, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals and potentially leading to catastrophic expenses. This review highlights a lack of recent research on healthcare financing in high-income countries, while recent studies in low- and middle-income countries align with commitment to deliver universal health coverage. Continuous analysis of the redistributive effects of the health system is essential to ensure that health financing systems not only fund healthcare effectively but also contribute to broader social equity goals.

摘要

本综述总结了关于医疗融资机制的累进性和再分配效应的实证研究。各国以及不同融资来源的证据差异显著。基于税收的体系具有高度累进性,因为直接税有助于向低收入家庭进行有利的再分配,通常抵消了间接税的累退性质。社会保险体系被认为具有累进性,但在实践中可能因缴费上限和高收入者豁免而具有累退性。这就造成了一种差异,即高收入纳税人从社会保护中受益,但其对总收入的贡献比例较低,限制了对收入不平等的总体正向再分配效应。大多数有共付额的卫生系统采用统一费率而非基于收入的费率,对低收入个人影响过大,并可能导致灾难性支出。本综述强调,高收入国家近期缺乏关于医疗融资的研究,而低收入和中等收入国家的近期研究与实现全民健康覆盖的承诺相一致。持续分析卫生系统的再分配效应对于确保卫生融资系统不仅能有效资助医疗保健,还能促进更广泛的社会公平目标至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验