Suppr超能文献

丙酸氯倍他索或贝沙罗汀治疗早期蕈样肉芽肿的疗效比较。

Comparison of the efficacy of treatment with clobetasol propionate or bexarotene in early-stage mycosis fungoides.

作者信息

Çerman Aslı Aksu, Cetinkaya Pinar Ozdemir, Kurt Birgül Özkesici, Kırker Artun, Altunay İlknur

机构信息

Dermatology Department, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Seyrantepe, İstanbul, Turkey.

Dermatology Department, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Seyrantepe, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

An Bras Dermatol. 2025 Mar-Apr;100(2):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few studies in the literature comparing the effectiveness of topical treatments in early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF).

OBJECTIVES

It was aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, side effects and topical treatment compliance with bexarotene or clobetasol propionate in early-stage MF.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with stage IA-IB MF were enrolled in the study. Twenty patients were treated with 1% bexarotene gel and 20 patients were treated with 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment.

RESULTS

In the bexarotene group, 11 patients (55%) had complete clinical response (CCR) and 5 patients (25%) had partial response (PR) while in the clobetasol propionate group, 10 patients (50%) had CCR and 9 patients (45%) had PR. The median duration of remission was 10.5 months in the bexarotene group and 4 months in the clobetasol propionate group. The remission period was statistically significantly longer in the bexarotene group (p = 0.032). Irritation symptoms were statistically significantly more common in the bexarotene group (p = 0.001).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The limitation of the study was its retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Both topical bexarotene and topical clobetasol propionate were found to be effective in MF. Irritation symptoms were more common with topical bexarotene. Moreover, the remission period with topical bexarotene was significantly longer.

摘要

背景

文献中很少有关于比较局部治疗早期蕈样肉芽肿(MF)有效性的研究。

目的

旨在评估贝沙罗汀或丙酸氯倍他索局部治疗早期MF的临床疗效、副作用及局部治疗依从性。

方法

共纳入40例IA - IB期MF患者。20例患者接受1%贝沙罗汀凝胶治疗,20例患者接受0.05%丙酸氯倍他索软膏治疗。

结果

在贝沙罗汀组,11例患者(55%)达到完全临床缓解(CCR),5例患者(25%)达到部分缓解(PR);而在丙酸氯倍他索组,10例患者(50%)达到CCR,9例患者(45%)达到PR。贝沙罗汀组的中位缓解持续时间为10.5个月,丙酸氯倍他索组为4个月。贝沙罗汀组的缓解期在统计学上显著更长(p = 0.032)。贝沙罗汀组的刺激症状在统计学上显著更常见(p = 0.001)。

研究局限性

本研究的局限性在于其回顾性设计。

结论

局部应用贝沙罗汀和局部应用丙酸氯倍他索在MF治疗中均有效。贝沙罗汀局部应用时刺激症状更常见。此外,贝沙罗汀局部应用的缓解期显著更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9645/11962818/96fd9024b6a7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验