Poolkerd Wachirakorn, Swatasuk Boonlased, Saengpitak Methanee, Muangsawat Sureeporn, Klankeo Piriya, Thotsaporn Kittisak, Ampornaramveth Ruchanee Salingcarnboriboon
Center of Excellence on Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Omics Sciences & Bioinformatics Center, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05304-4.
Microorganisms in dental unit water (DUW) play a significant role in dental bioaerosols. If the methods used to decontaminate DUW also help improve air quality in dental clinics is worth exploring. In this study, we aim to identify the source of bacteria in dental bioaerosols and investigate the impact of waterline disinfectants on the quantity and composition of bacteria in DUW and bioaerosols.
Two dental chair units in a separate treatment room are installed with two different waterline decontamination systems, a plasma or iodine cartridge. The experiment was performed in two phases, before and after installing the decontamination systems. Aerosol is generated via running airotor in the subject's mouth. Before and after the procedure, the air samples were collected with an active air sampling machine onto agar plate and filter paper for genomic DNA extraction. The subject's saliva and DUW samples were also collected. The samples were analyzed further with bacterial counting and metataxonomics analysis.
The bacteria present in the air sample after the aerosol-generating procedure were confirmed to be derived from the air-before, saliva, and DUW in 51.43%, 6.38%, and 18.60%, respectively. The saliva samples demonstrated the highest alpha diversity (within the sample), whereas the air samples had the least. Both waterline disinfectants effectively controlled bacteria in DUW but did not affect the bacterial number and composition in the air.
Dental bioaerosols are composed of bacteria from saliva and DUW. Plasma and iodine showed a trend in controlling bacterial contamination in DUW but did not alter the bacterial count and composition in dental bioaerosols.
牙科设备用水(DUW)中的微生物在牙科生物气溶胶中起着重要作用。用于净化DUW的方法是否也有助于改善牙科诊所的空气质量值得探讨。在本研究中,我们旨在确定牙科生物气溶胶中细菌的来源,并研究水线消毒剂对DUW和生物气溶胶中细菌数量和组成的影响。
在一个单独的治疗室中,两个牙科椅单元安装了两种不同的水线净化系统,即等离子体或碘滤芯。实验分两个阶段进行,分别在安装净化系统之前和之后。通过在受试者口腔中运行气涡轮产生气溶胶。在操作前后,用主动空气采样机将空气样本采集到琼脂平板和滤纸上,用于提取基因组DNA。还采集了受试者的唾液和DUW样本。通过细菌计数和宏分类学分析对样本进行进一步分析。
气溶胶生成程序后空气样本中存在的细菌经确认分别有51.43%、6.38%和18.60%来自操作前的空气、唾液和DUW。唾液样本的α多样性(样本内)最高,而空气样本的α多样性最低。两种水线消毒剂均有效控制了DUW中的细菌,但对空气中的细菌数量和组成没有影响。
牙科生物气溶胶由来自唾液和DUW的细菌组成。等离子体和碘在控制DUW中的细菌污染方面呈现出一定趋势,但并未改变牙科生物气溶胶中的细菌数量和组成。