School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Dent Res. 2022 Sep;101(10):1198-1204. doi: 10.1177/00220345221093522. Epub 2022 May 1.
Oral microbes are dispersed during dental treatment and reduction methods have been proposed, but dental unit waterline (DUWL) disinfectants have received little attention; specifically, the effect on viruses has not been studied. This study aims to 1) investigate the effect of DUWL disinfectants on viral dispersion in dental bioaerosols and 2) establish a dual-tracer system using live bacteriophage and fluorescein supported by optical particle measurement. Bacteriophage MS2 was used as a viral tracer and fluorescein as a fluorescent tracer. Validation experiments were conducted to exclude interference of one tracer with the other or of DUWL disinfectants on detection methods. Simulated "saliva" containing the tracers was infused into the mouth of a dental mannequin during 10-min dental procedures with an air turbine handpiece ( 3 replicates). Aerosols and droplets were sampled in an enclosed dental operatory using air samplers and settlement onto sterile filter papers. Bacteriophage was quantified using plaque assays and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Fluorescein was quantified fluorometrically. The effect of DUWL disinfectants on total aerosol concentration was assessed in separate experiments using an optical particle counter. DUWL disinfectants reduced bacteriophage viability, and interference between tracers was not observed. In simulated clinical procedures, the disinfectant ICX reduced bacteriophage detection substantially ( < 0.001; 2-way analysis of variance). MS2 RNA was detected in all experimental samples but not negative controls. Samples positive on RT-qPCR but not plaque assays may indicate that virions at distant sites are nonviable. Fluorescein tracer showed good agreement with the bacteriophage tracer. DUWL disinfectants designed for continuous presence in irrigants reduce the dispersion of viable virus in dental bioaerosols during simulated procedures. Their use may therefore be important for routine infection control and as a mitigation factor during infectious disease outbreaks. Future studies should explore this using a range of viruses and other microbes.
口腔微生物在牙科治疗过程中会分散,已经提出了减少微生物分散的方法,但牙科用水线(DUWL)消毒剂很少受到关注;特别是,其对病毒的影响尚未得到研究。本研究旨在:1)调查 DUWL 消毒剂对牙科生物气溶胶中病毒分散的影响;2)建立一个使用活噬菌体和荧光素的双重示踪系统,由光粒子测量法支持。噬菌体 MS2 被用作病毒示踪剂,荧光素作为荧光示踪剂。验证实验排除了一种示踪剂对另一种示踪剂或 DUWL 消毒剂对检测方法的干扰。模拟“唾液”含有示踪剂,通过空气涡轮手机在牙科模型口中进行 10 分钟的牙科手术(3 个重复)。使用空气采样器在封闭的牙科诊室中采集气溶胶和液滴,并沉降到无菌滤纸上。使用菌斑测定法和逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)定量噬菌体。使用荧光计定量荧光素。在单独的实验中,使用光粒子计数器评估 DUWL 消毒剂对总气溶胶浓度的影响。DUWL 消毒剂降低了噬菌体的生存能力,并且示踪剂之间没有观察到干扰。在模拟临床操作中,消毒剂 ICX 大大降低了噬菌体的检测(<0.001;双向方差分析)。所有实验样本中均检测到 MS2 RNA,但阴性对照中未检测到。在 RT-qPCR 检测呈阳性但在菌斑测定中未检测到的样本可能表明远处的病毒粒子是无活力的。荧光素示踪剂与噬菌体示踪剂具有良好的一致性。设计用于连续存在于冲洗液中的 DUWL 消毒剂可减少模拟操作过程中牙科生物气溶胶中可存活病毒的分散。因此,它们的使用可能对常规感染控制很重要,并且在传染病爆发期间是一种缓解因素。未来的研究应使用一系列病毒和其他微生物来探索这一点。