• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两个测量初级保健中健康状况的项目示例中使用患者报告结局:一项观察性研究。

Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Two Program Examples Measuring Health Status in Primary Care: An Observational Study.

作者信息

Soprovich Allison L, Short Hilary, Ali Al-Bakir, Brower Krista, Ohinmaa Arto, Johnson Jeffrey A

机构信息

Alberta PROMs and EQ-5D Research and Support Unit (APERSU), School of Public Health University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.

Edmonton O-day'min Primary Care Network Edmonton Alberta Canada.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;8(1):e70308. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70308. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70308
PMID:39741745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683768/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in primary care practices; however, the broad characteristics of this population pose unique challenges. Generic PROMs (e.g., EQ-5D-5L) measure general health status from the patient's perspective, contributing towards a comprehensive evaluation of health programming. This study describes the integration of the EQ-5D-5L within program evaluation in primary care in Alberta, Canada, using two program examples.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal, observational design was used. The Edmonton O-day'min Primary Care Network (EOPCN) routinely collects the EQ-5D-5L in their exercise and active living and nutrition programs. Data collected between January 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022 was analyzed descriptively, by dimension, index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Minimally important differences were used to interpret index (0.04) and VAS scores (7.0) and the Pareto Classification of Health Change was applied to the dimensions. Effect size of change in index and VAS scores and population comparisons were examined.

RESULTS

In the exercise and active living program ( = 301), 72% were female with a mean age of 57 (±16) years, and 90.2% reported any problems (levels 2-5) in pain/discomfort. The mean index and VAS scores were 0.74 (±0.18) and 66.5 (±18.9), respectively. Among those with repeated measurement (n = 112), the greatest improvement was in usual activities (17%); the greatest deterioration was in pain/discomfort (25%). In the nutrition program ( = 573), 71% were female with a mean age of 50 (±17) years, and 75.9% reported any problems in pain/discomfort. The mean index and VAS scores were 0.77 (±0.19) and 70.1 (±15.6), respectively. Among those with repeated measurement ( = 212), the greatest improvement was in anxiety/depression (16%); the greatest deterioration was in pain/discomfort (26%). In both, health status was lower than the general Alberta population norms. No baseline characteristics were found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

These results inform future programming, to help patient needs.

摘要

背景与目的

患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)在初级医疗实践中越来越常用;然而,该人群的广泛特征带来了独特的挑战。通用的PROMs(如EQ-5D-5L)从患者角度衡量总体健康状况,有助于对健康规划进行全面评估。本研究使用两个项目实例描述了EQ-5D-5L在加拿大艾伯塔省初级医疗项目评估中的整合情况。

方法

采用回顾性、纵向观察性设计。埃德蒙顿O日初级医疗网络(EOPCN)在其运动与积极生活以及营养项目中常规收集EQ-5D-5L数据。对2021年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间收集的数据按维度、指数和视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分进行描述性分析。使用最小重要差异来解释指数(0.04)和VAS得分(7.0),并将健康变化的帕累托分类应用于各维度。检验指数和VAS得分变化的效应大小以及人群比较情况。

结果

在运动与积极生活项目(n = 301)中,72%为女性,平均年龄57(±16)岁,90.2%报告在疼痛/不适方面存在任何问题(2 - 5级)。平均指数和VAS得分分别为0.74(±0.18)和66.5(±18.9)。在进行重复测量的人群(n = 112)中,改善最大的是日常活动(17%);恶化最大的是疼痛/不适(25%)。在营养项目(n = 573)中,71%为女性,平均年龄50(±17)岁,75.9%报告在疼痛/不适方面存在任何问题。平均指数和VAS得分分别为0.77(±0.19)和70.1(±15.6)。在进行重复测量的人群(n = 212)中,改善最大的是焦虑/抑郁(16%);恶化最大的是疼痛/不适(26%)。在这两个项目中,健康状况均低于艾伯塔省总体人群的标准。未发现基线特征具有统计学意义。

结论

这些结果为未来的项目规划提供了参考,以满足患者需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3973/11683768/2f9a5e4d5e4e/HSR2-8-e70308-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3973/11683768/dc0f8291954f/HSR2-8-e70308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3973/11683768/2f9a5e4d5e4e/HSR2-8-e70308-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3973/11683768/dc0f8291954f/HSR2-8-e70308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3973/11683768/2f9a5e4d5e4e/HSR2-8-e70308-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Two Program Examples Measuring Health Status in Primary Care: An Observational Study.在两个测量初级保健中健康状况的项目示例中使用患者报告结局:一项观察性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;8(1):e70308. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70308. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The use of EQ-5D-5L as a patient-reported outcome measure in evaluating community rehabilitation services in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省使用 EQ-5D-5L 作为评价社区康复服务的患者报告结局测量工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Nov 17;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02207-w.
3
Norms for the EQ-5D-5L among the general adult population in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省普通成年人群体中EQ-5D-5L的常模。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03804-y. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
4
Population norms of health-related quality of life in Iran: findings from a national EQ-5D-5L study.伊朗健康相关生活质量的人群规范:一项全国性EQ-5D-5L研究的结果
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 May 7;23(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02378-8.
5
EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China.中国城市人群 EQ-5D-5L 量表中国常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Nov 8;16(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1036-2.
6
Use of EQ-5D-5L for Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in a National Register for Specialized Rehabilitation.在全国专科康复登记系统中使用EQ-5D-5L评估患者报告的结局
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan;105(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.026. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
8
A life that's worth living - measuring health-related quality of life among people treated for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: a longitudinal EQ-5D-5L survey.值得过的生活——衡量越南结核病患者的健康相关生活质量:一项纵向EQ-5D-5L调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 23;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02369-9.
9
Health-related quality of life among Indian population: The EQ-5D population norms for India.印度人群的健康相关生活质量:印度 EQ-5D 人群正常值。
J Glob Health. 2023 Feb 17;13:04018. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04018.
10
Self-reported health-related quality of life of the general population in Alberta, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大艾伯塔省普通人群在新冠疫情期间自我报告的与健康相关的生活质量
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Oct 12;6(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00518-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life in primary care patients: a comparison between EQ-5D-5L utility score and EQ-visual analogue scale.初级保健患者的健康相关生活质量:EQ-5D-5L 效用评分与 EQ-视觉模拟量表的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jan 3;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02215-w.
2
The use of EQ-5D-5L as a patient-reported outcome measure in evaluating community rehabilitation services in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省使用 EQ-5D-5L 作为评价社区康复服务的患者报告结局测量工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Nov 17;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02207-w.
3
The use of patient-reported outcome measures in primary care: applications, benefits and challenges.
患者报告结局测量指标在初级保健中的应用:应用、益处及挑战
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Oct 12;5(Suppl 2):84. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00361-7.
4
Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A.测量健康相关生活质量和幸福感:EQ-5D-5L、ReQoL-UI 和 ICECAP-A 的头对头心理测量比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):165-176. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01359-0. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues.患者报告结局测量(PROMs):通用和特定疾病测量工具的综述,以及对趋势和问题的讨论。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1015-1024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13254. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.比较 EQ-5D-5L 与牛津髋关节和膝关节评分以及 SF-12 在全膝关节置换后 1 年骨关节炎患者中的有效性和反应性。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1311-1322. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores.仪器定义的EQ-5D-5L指数得分最小重要差异估计值。
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):644-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.015. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
8
EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future.EQ-5D与欧洲生活质量小组:过去、现在与未来。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.
9
Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study.利用项目评估支持跨专业初级保健团队中的知识转化:一项案例研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4.
10
Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.常规使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs)以改善成人常见精神障碍的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD011119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.