Zhao Aijun, Tu Dongsheng, He Ye, Liu Liu, Wu Bin, Ren Yixing
School of Mathematical Science and Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 17;15:1497254. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1497254. eCollection 2024.
In a randomized clinical controlled trial (PA.3) conducted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, the effects of gemcitabine combined with the targeted drug erlotinib (GEM-E) gemcitabine alone (GEM) on patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic pancreatic cancer were studied. This trial statistically demonstrated that the GEM-E combination therapy moderately improves overall survival (OS) of patients. However, real-world analysis suggested that GEM-E for pancreatic cancer was not more effective than GEM. The heterogeneity in outcomes or treatment effect exist. Thus, we tried to find predictive biomarkers to identifying the heterogeneous patients.
Of the 569 eligible patients, 480 patients had plasma samples. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify baseline characteristics related to OS, and a risk adjusted Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) control chart based on a weighted score test from the Cox model was constructed to monitor patients' survival risk. Maximally selected rank statistics were constructed to identifying the predictive biomarkers, in addition, a risk adjusted control chart based on a weighted score test from the Cox model was constructed to validating the predictive biomarkers, discover the patients who sensitive to the GEM-E or GEM.
Three baseline characteristics (ECOG performance status, extent of disease, and pain intensity) were identified related to prognosis. A risk-adjusted EWMA control chart was constructed and showed that GEM-E did improve OS in a few patients. Three biomarkers (BMP2, CXCL6, and HER2) were identified as predictive biomarkers based on maximum selected rank test, and using the risk-adjusted EWMA control chart to validate the reality and discover some patients who are sensitive to the GEM-E therapy.
In reality, GEM-E has not shown a significant advantage over GEM in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. However, we discovered some patients who are sensitive to the GEM-E therapy based on the predictive biomarkers, which suggest that the predictive biomarkers provide ideas for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer.
在加拿大癌症试验组进行的一项随机临床对照试验(PA.3)中,研究了吉西他滨联合靶向药物厄洛替尼(GEM-E)与单独使用吉西他滨(GEM)对不可切除、局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌患者的疗效。该试验经统计学证明,GEM-E联合治疗可适度提高患者的总生存期(OS)。然而,真实世界分析表明,GEM-E治疗胰腺癌并不比GEM更有效。存在结果或治疗效果的异质性。因此,我们试图寻找预测性生物标志物以识别异质性患者。
在569名符合条件的患者中,480名患者有血浆样本。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型来识别与OS相关的基线特征,并基于Cox模型的加权评分检验构建风险调整指数加权移动平均(EWMA)控制图以监测患者的生存风险。构建最大选择秩统计量以识别预测性生物标志物,此外,基于Cox模型的加权评分检验构建风险调整控制图以验证预测性生物标志物,发现对GEM-E或GEM敏感的患者。
确定了三个与预后相关的基线特征(东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、疾病范围和疼痛强度)。构建了风险调整的EWMA控制图,结果显示GEM-E确实改善了少数患者的OS。基于最大选择秩检验确定了三个生物标志物(骨形态发生蛋白2、CXC趋化因子配体6和人表皮生长因子受体2)作为预测性生物标志物,并使用风险调整的EWMA控制图验证其真实性并发现一些对GEM-E治疗敏感的患者。
在现实中,GEM-E在治疗胰腺癌方面并未显示出比GEM有显著优势。然而,我们基于预测性生物标志物发现了一些对GEM-E治疗敏感的患者,这表明预测性生物标志物为胰腺癌的个性化医疗提供了思路。