Clark J G
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 Feb;50(1):60-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5001.60.
Past investigations of alaryngeal speech intelligibility have focused on comparative intelligibility as perceived by young normally hearing adults. However, the spouses and social companions of laryngectomees may have significantly different auditory capabilities compared to young listeners. This report presents a comparison of alaryngeal and laryngeal speech identification performance for a group of young normally hearing listeners and a group of older adult listeners representative of the age of the laryngectomee's social companions. The speech signals investigated included normal laryngeal speech, artificial larynx speech, traditional esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech. The results obtained reveal not only differences in speech signals but also a difference in the proficiency of speech perception for the two groups, favoring the younger listeners. The results of the speech identification measures in the presence of auditory competition revealed greatest intelligibility for the artificial larynx speech signal and poorest for the tracheoesophageal speech signal.
过去对无喉语音清晰度的研究主要集中在年轻听力正常的成年人所感知到的比较清晰度上。然而,与年轻听众相比,喉切除患者的配偶和社交伙伴可能具有显著不同的听觉能力。本报告比较了一组年轻听力正常的听众和一组代表喉切除患者社交伙伴年龄的老年听众对无喉语音和有喉语音的识别表现。所研究的语音信号包括正常喉语音、人工喉语音、传统食管语音和气管食管语音。所得结果不仅揭示了语音信号的差异,还显示了两组在语音感知能力上的差异,年轻听众表现更优。在存在听觉竞争的情况下进行的语音识别测量结果显示,人工喉语音信号的清晰度最高,气管食管语音信号的清晰度最差。