Bollati Mario, Ercolano Vincenzo, Mazzarotto Pietro
Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 23;25(12):448. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512448. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) represents a quite rare event but with potentially serious prognostic implications. Meanwhile, SCAD typically presents as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the majority of SCAD presentation being characterized by typical ACS signs and symptoms, young age at presentation with an atypical atherosclerotic risk factor profile is responsible for late medical contact and misdiagnosis. The diagnostic algorithm is similar to that for ACS. Low-risk factors prevalence and young age would push toward non-invasive imaging (such as coronary computed tomography (CT)); instead, the gold standard diagnostic exam for SCAD is an invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to its increased sensitivity and disease characterization. Moreover, intravascular imaging (IVI) improves ICA diagnostic performance, confirming the diagnosis and clarifying the disease mechanism. A SCAD-ICA classification recognizes four angiographic appearances according to lesion extension and features (radiolucent lumen, long and diffuse narrowing, focal stenosis, and vessel occlusion). Concerning its management, the preferred approach is conservative due to the high rates of spontaneous healing in the first months and the low rate of revascularization success (high complexity percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with dissection/hematoma extension risk). Revascularization is recommended in the presence of high-risk features (such as left main or multivessel involvement, hemodynamic instability, recurrent chest pain, or ST elevation). The first choice is PCI; coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is considered only if PCI is not feasible or too hazardous according to the operators' and centers' experience. Medical therapy includes beta blockers in cases of ventricular dysfunction; however, no clear data are available about antiplatelet treatment because of the supposed risk of intramural hematoma enlargement. Furthermore, screening for extracardiac arthropathies or connective tissue diseases is recommended due to the hypothesized association with SCAD. Eventually, SCAD follow-up is important, considering the risk of SCAD recurrence. Considering the young age of patients with SCAD, subsequent care is essential (including psychological support, also for relatives) with the aim of safe and complete reintegration into a non-limited everyday life.
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是一种相当罕见的事件,但具有潜在的严重预后影响。同时,SCAD通常表现为急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。尽管大多数SCAD表现以典型的ACS体征和症状为特征,但发病时年龄较轻且具有非典型动脉粥样硬化危险因素谱会导致就医延迟和误诊。其诊断算法与ACS相似。低风险因素患病率和年轻患者倾向于采用非侵入性成像(如冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT));相反,由于其更高的敏感性和疾病特征描述,SCAD的金标准诊断检查是有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)。此外,血管内成像(IVI)可提高ICA的诊断性能,确认诊断并阐明疾病机制。SCAD-ICA分类根据病变范围和特征(透亮管腔、长而弥漫性狭窄、局灶性狭窄和血管闭塞)识别四种血管造影表现。关于其治疗,首选方法是保守治疗,因为在最初几个月自发愈合率高,且血管重建成功率低(高复杂性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)有夹层/血肿扩展风险)。存在高风险特征(如左主干或多支血管受累、血流动力学不稳定、反复胸痛或ST段抬高)时建议进行血管重建。首选是PCI;只有根据术者和中心的经验,PCI不可行或风险太大时才考虑冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。药物治疗在心室功能不全的情况下包括使用β受体阻滞剂;然而,由于存在壁内血肿扩大的假定风险,关于抗血小板治疗尚无明确数据。此外,由于推测与SCAD有关联,建议筛查心外关节病或结缔组织病。最后,考虑到SCAD复发的风险,SCAD随访很重要。鉴于SCAD患者年龄较轻,后续护理至关重要(包括心理支持,对亲属也一样),目的是安全、完全地重新融入不受限制的日常生活。