Baker H L, Berquist T H, Kispert D B, Reese D F, Houser O W, Earnest F, Forbes G S, May G R
Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 Feb;60(2):75-90. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60292-4.
The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in the first 1,000 consecutive patients who were studied by this technique at our institution were reviewed to determine the disease states encountered, the sensitivity and accuracy of results, and the value of the examination as compared with computed tomography and other imaging procedures. The MRI device was a 0.15-tesla resistive magnet that used a variety of saturation recovery, spin echo, and inversion recovery pulse sequences to produce images. MRI was found equal to or superior to other imaging techniques in most cases. Exceptions included organs or body regions that are prone to excessive respiratory or vascular motion, lesions that necessitate exquisite spatial resolution for diagnosis, and lesions in which angulation of the viewing plane is necessary for optimal depiction. Fresh blood and calcification within a lesion were also difficult to detect with use of MRI.
回顾了在我们机构采用该技术研究的首批连续1000例患者的磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果,以确定所遇到的疾病状态、结果的敏感性和准确性,以及与计算机断层扫描和其他成像检查相比该检查的价值。MRI设备是一台0.15特斯拉的电阻磁体,使用多种饱和恢复、自旋回波和反转恢复脉冲序列来生成图像。在大多数情况下,MRI被发现等同于或优于其他成像技术。例外情况包括易于出现过度呼吸或血管运动的器官或身体区域、诊断需要极高空间分辨率的病变,以及为获得最佳显示需要观察平面成角的病变。病变内的新鲜血液和钙化也很难通过MRI检测到。