Thomas Sarah K, Moore John W, Pandey Vivek N, Eichinger Josef K, Rogalski Brandon L, Friedman Richard J
Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec 30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.005.
With the rise of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), revision TSA is also becoming more prominent. However, there is a paucity of literature on potential racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities regarding revision TSA. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk and reason for revision TSA between racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups.
The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 to identify all patients who underwent primary TSA and revision TSA. The risk of revision was calculated for each racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic group between 2016 and 2020 using the total number of revision and primary TSAs. The reason for revision was also compared between cohorts.
Hispanic patients were 13% less likely to undergo revision TSA than White patients after primary TSA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87). Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients demonstrated similar risks of revision to White patients. Black and Hispanic patients were 48% and 63% less likely to have mechanical complications as the cause of revision than White patients, respectively (OR = 0.52 and 0.37), and Black patients were 5 times more likely to require revision due to osteolysis (OR = 4.8). Risk of revision TSA was similar between socioeconomic groups. Patients of lower socioeconomic status were less likely to require revision due to mechanical complications or osteolysis than patients in the highest income quartile.
Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in revision TSA, though not to the extent that has previously been investigated in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. Race was predictive of the reason for revision TSA with Black patients undergoing revision for different reasons on average than White patients. The reasons for revision also differed across income quartiles with lowest income quartile patients differing from those in the highest income quartile. Raising awareness and emphasizing the reduction of variability could aid in further decreasing these disparities and alleviating the impact of social determinants of health on revision TSA.
随着全肩关节置换术(TSA)的兴起,翻修TSA也变得越来越突出。然而,关于翻修TSA潜在的种族、民族和社会经济差异的文献较少。本研究的目的是确定种族、民族和社会经济群体之间翻修TSA的风险和原因。
查询2016年至2020年的全国住院患者样本,以识别所有接受初次TSA和翻修TSA的患者。使用翻修和初次TSA的总数计算2016年至2020年每个种族、民族和社会经济群体的翻修风险。还比较了不同队列之间的翻修原因。
初次TSA后,西班牙裔患者接受翻修TSA的可能性比白人患者低13%(优势比[OR]=0.87)。黑人和亚裔/太平洋岛民患者的翻修风险与白人患者相似。黑人和西班牙裔患者因机械并发症导致翻修的可能性分别比白人患者低48%和63%(OR=0.52和0.37),而黑人患者因骨溶解需要翻修的可能性是白人患者的5倍(OR=4.8)。社会经济群体之间翻修TSA的风险相似。社会经济地位较低的患者因机械并发症或骨溶解而需要翻修的可能性低于收入最高四分位数的患者。
翻修TSA存在种族、民族和社会经济差异,尽管程度不如先前在下肢全关节置换术中所研究的那样。种族是翻修TSA原因的预测因素,黑人患者平均因不同原因接受翻修,与白人患者不同。翻修原因在不同收入四分位数之间也有所不同,收入最低四分位数的患者与收入最高四分位数的患者不同。提高认识并强调减少变异性有助于进一步减少这些差异,并减轻健康的社会决定因素对翻修TSA的影响。