Kihlstrom Anna Charlotta, Stiller Tara, Sultana Nishat, Njau Grace, Schmidt Matthew, Stepanov Anastasia, Williams Andrew D
Department of Indigenous Health, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA.
Public Health Program, Department of Population Health, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA.
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00698-x.
Marriage promotes breastfeeding duration through economic and social supports. The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected marginalized communities and impacted women's employment and interpersonal dynamics. This study examined how marriage affects breastfeeding duration across socioeconomic and racially minoritized groups during COVID-19, aiming to inform social support strategies for vulnerable families in public health crises.
For this cross-sectional study, data were drawn from the 2017-2021 North Dakota Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (weighted n = 41433). Breastfeeding duration was self-reported, and 2-, 4-, and 6-month duration variables were calculated. Marital status(married, not married) and education (< high school education, ≥high school education) were drawn from birth certificates. Income (≤ US$48,000, > US$48,000) and race/ethnicity (White, American Indian, Other) were self-reported. Infant birth date was used to identify pre-COVID (2017-2019) and COVID (2020-2021) births. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between marital status and breastfeeding duration outcomes. Models were fit overall, by COVID-19 era and by demographic factors. Lastly, demographic-specific models were further stratified by COVID era. Models were adjusted for maternal health and sociodemographic factors.
Overall, married women consistently had 2-fold higher odds of breastfeeding across all durations during both pre-COVID and COVID eras. Pre-COVID, marriage was a stronger predictor for all breastfeeding durations in low-income women (4-month duration OR 4.07, 95%CI 2.52, 6.58) than for high-income women (4-month duration OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.06, 2.91). Conversely, during COVID, marriage was a stronger predictor of breastfeeding duration for high-income women (4-month duration OR 2.89, 95%CI 1.47, 5.68) than low-income women (4-month duration OR 1.59, 95%CI 0.80, 3.15). Findings were similar among American Indian women and those with less than high school education, in that both groups lost the benefit of marriage on breastfeeding duration during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Marriage promotes breastfeeding duration, yet the observed benefit was reduced for low-socioeconomic and racially minoritized populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. These observations highlight the disproportionate impacts low-socioeconomic and racially minoritized populations face during public health crises. Continued research examining how major societal disruptions intersect with social determinants to shape breastfeeding outcomes can inform more equitable systems of care.
婚姻通过经济和社会支持促进母乳喂养的持续时间。新冠疫情对边缘化社区产生了不成比例的影响,并影响了女性的就业和人际关系动态。本研究调查了在新冠疫情期间,婚姻如何影响不同社会经济和少数族裔群体的母乳喂养持续时间,旨在为公共卫生危机中弱势家庭的社会支持策略提供信息。
在这项横断面研究中,数据来自2017 - 2021年北达科他州妊娠风险评估监测系统(加权n = 41433)。母乳喂养持续时间由自我报告得出,并计算了2个月、4个月和6个月的持续时间变量。婚姻状况(已婚、未婚)和教育程度(高中以下学历、高中及以上学历)来自出生证明。收入(≤48000美元、> 48000美元)和种族/族裔(白人、美洲印第安人、其他)为自我报告。婴儿出生日期用于确定新冠疫情前(2017 - 2019年)和新冠疫情期间(2020 - 2021年)的出生情况。逻辑回归估计婚姻状况与母乳喂养持续时间结果之间关联强度的比值比和95%置信区间。模型整体拟合,按新冠疫情时期和人口统计学因素进行拟合。最后按新冠疫情时期对特定人口统计学模型进一步分层。模型对孕产妇健康和社会人口统计学因素进行了调整。
总体而言,已婚女性在新冠疫情前和疫情期间所有时间段进行母乳喂养的几率始终高出两倍。在新冠疫情前,婚姻对低收入女性所有母乳喂养持续时间的预测作用(4个月持续时间的比值比为4.07,95%置信区间为2.52,6.58)比对高收入女性更强(4个月持续时间的比值比为1.76,95%置信区间为1.06,2.91)。相反,在新冠疫情期间,婚姻对高收入女性母乳喂养持续时间的预测作用(4个月持续时间的比值比为2.89,95%置信区间为1.47,5.68)比对低收入女性更强(4个月持续时间的比值比为1.59,95%置信区间为0.80,3.15)。在美洲印第安女性和高中以下学历的女性中也有类似发现,即在新冠疫情期间,这两组女性都失去了婚姻对母乳喂养持续时间的益处。
婚姻促进母乳喂养持续时间,但在新冠疫情期间,社会经济地位低和少数族裔群体所观察到的这种益处有所减少。这些观察结果凸显了社会经济地位低和少数族裔群体在公共卫生危机期间面临的不成比例的影响。持续研究重大社会干扰如何与社会决定因素相互作用以塑造母乳喂养结果,可为更公平的护理系统提供信息。