Zhu Ke, Wang Yingchao, Lei Boya, Chen Ling, Zhang Yanqiong, Chang Qing, Xu Gezhi, Ni Yingqin
Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Nose, Throat Hospital of Fudan University, 83 Fen Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Eye Vis (Lond). 2025 Jan 2;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40662-024-00417-x.
To investigate the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole-associated retinal detachment (MHRD) after vitrectomy using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with autologous blood clot (ABC).
This retrospective observational study included 80 eyes with MHRD that underwent vitrectomy with ILM flap without (46 eyes) or with ABC (34 eyes). Fundus photography and optical coherence tomography were evaluated. The pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) and BCVA improvement were compared between the two groups.
The MH closure rates after initial surgery were similar in the ILM flap group and ILM flap with ABC group [40 (87%) vs. 29 (85%) eyes, respectively]. The proportion of eyes with hyperreflective bridging tissue (HBT) was lower in the ILM flap group than ILM flap with ABC group [13 (32%) vs. 16 (55%) eyes, P = 0.060]. The postoperative improvement in BCVA was significantly better in the ILM flap group (P = 0.027). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that preoperative BCVA was positively associated with postoperative improvement in BCVA (β = 0.638, P = 0.000), while the ILM flap with ABC technique was negatively associated with postoperative improvement in BCVA (β = - 0.299, P = 0.039, adjusted r = 0.415).
The inverted ILM flap technique alone resulted in better foveal configurations and visual outcomes than the ILM flap technique combined with ABC in patients with MHRD.
探讨采用带自体血凝块(ABC)的倒置内界膜(ILM)瓣技术行玻璃体切除术后黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离(MHRD)的解剖和功能结局。
这项回顾性观察研究纳入了80例接受了ILM瓣玻璃体切除术的MHRD患者,其中46例未使用ABC,34例使用了ABC。对眼底照片和光学相干断层扫描进行评估。比较两组术前和术后的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)及BCVA的改善情况。
初次手术后,ILM瓣组和ILM瓣联合ABC组的黄斑裂孔闭合率相似[分别为40(87%)例和29(85%)例]。ILM瓣组中出现高反射性桥接组织(HBT)的眼睛比例低于ILM瓣联合ABC组[分别为13(32%)例和16(55%)例,P = 0.060]。ILM瓣组术后BCVA的改善明显更好(P = 0.027)。多元线性回归分析显示,术前BCVA与术后BCVA的改善呈正相关(β = 0.638,P = 0.000),而ILM瓣联合ABC技术与术后BCVA的改善呈负相关(β = -0.299,P = 0.039,调整后r = 0.415)。
对于MHRD患者,单独的倒置ILM瓣技术比ILM瓣联合ABC技术能带来更好的黄斑中心凹形态和视觉结局。