Maroufi S Farzad, Fallahi Mohammad Sadegh, Maroufi S Parmis, Kassaeyan Vida, Palmisciano Paolo, Sheehan Jason P
Neurosurgical Research Network (NRN), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 2;48(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6.
Resection is often the primary treatment for large brain tumors but is less practical for multiple brain metastases (BM). Current guidelines recommend stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for untreated BMs or following the surgical removal of a solitary BM to reduce the risk of local tumor recurrence. Preoperative SRS (pre-SRS) shows promise with fewer complications and more precise targeting, but it lacks tissue diagnosis and may hinder wound healing. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of pre-SRS and postoperative SRS (post-SRS) for BM treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on PICO criteria, including patients with metastatic intracranial lesions undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiosurgery. Data related to outcomes and complications were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed, employing the fixed effect model due to study design similarities and limited patient numbers. Four studies encompassing 616 BM patients (221 preoperative, 405 postoperative) were included. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, cancer source, and lesion location, were similar between groups. Radiosurgery modalities included LINAC and Gamma Knife, with hypofractionated treatments more common postoperatively. Outcomes showed comparable overall survival (p = 0.07), local failure (p = 0.26), and distant failure rates (p = 0.84) between groups. The preoperative group had lower risks of radiation necrosis (p = 0.02) and leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.03) in 1-year follow-up, with significantly better composite outcomes (p = 0.04). No significant difference in wound issues was observed (p = 0.98). This review reveals pre- and post-SRS for BM have similar outcomes for LF, DF, and OS. Pre-SRS potentially lowers RN and LMD risks, with better tumor targeting and less radiation to healthy tissue, while post-SRS targets residual disease but with higher complication risks. Future research should optimize SRS protocols.
手术切除通常是治疗大脑肿瘤的主要方法,但对于多发性脑转移瘤(BM)而言不太实用。当前指南推荐对未经治疗的BM或在手术切除单个BM后进行立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS),以降低局部肿瘤复发风险。术前SRS(pre-SRS)显示出前景,并发症较少且靶向更精确,但它缺乏组织诊断,可能会妨碍伤口愈合。本研究旨在比较pre-SRS和术后SRS(post-SRS)治疗BM的安全性和有效性。在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索。根据PICO标准选择研究,包括接受术前或术后放射外科治疗的颅内转移病变患者。提取与结局和并发症相关的数据。由于研究设计相似且患者数量有限,采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。纳入了四项研究,共616例BM患者(221例术前,405例术后)。两组患者的特征,包括年龄、性别、癌症来源和病变位置相似。放射外科治疗方式包括直线加速器和伽玛刀,术后超分割治疗更为常见。结果显示,两组之间的总生存率(p = 0.07)、局部失败率(p = 0.26)和远处失败率(p = 0.84)相当。在1年随访中,术前组的放射性坏死风险(p = 0.02)和软脑膜疾病风险(p = 0.03)较低,综合结局明显更好(p = 0.04)。在伤口问题方面未观察到显著差异(p = 0.98)。本综述表明,pre-SRS和post-SRS治疗BM在局部失败、远处失败和总生存方面有相似的结局。Pre-SRS可能会降低放射性坏死和软脑膜疾病的风险,对肿瘤的靶向性更好,对健康组织的辐射更少,而post-SRS针对残留疾病,但并发症风险更高。未来的研究应优化SRS方案。