• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Setting Limits for the Principle of Equal Entitlement to Continued Life.

作者信息

Moreno-Ternero Juan D, Østerdal Lars Peter

机构信息

Department of Economics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide.

Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2025 Jan 2:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000768.

DOI:10.1017/S0963180124000768
PMID:39743859
Abstract

The normative principle that every individual is equally entitled to continued life is a subject of debate in ethics, health economics and policy. We reconsider this principle in the context of setting priorities for healthcare interventions. When applied without restriction, the principle overlooks quality of life concerns entirely. However, we contend that it remains ethically relevant in certain situations, particularly when patients suffer from conditions unrelated to the therapeutic areas and treatments under consideration. Thus, we defend the principle while also emphasizing the need for its application within tight limits.

摘要

相似文献

1
Setting Limits for the Principle of Equal Entitlement to Continued Life.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2025 Jan 2:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000768.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
How to derive ethically appropriate recommendations for action? A methodology for applied ethics.如何推导出符合伦理道德的行动建议?应用伦理学方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Jun;26(2):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10133-9. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
QALYS and ethics: a health economist's perspective.质量调整生命年与伦理学:一位卫生经济学家的视角
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(12):1795-804. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00082-2.
5
Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle.反对将比例不足作为优先设置原则。
J Med Ethics. 2018 May;44(5):305-309. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104488. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Justice and equal opportunities in health care.医疗保健中的公平与平等机会。
Bioethics. 1999 Oct;13(5):392-404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00167.
7
What healthcare teams find ethically difficult.医疗团队在伦理方面遇到的难题。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Dec;23(8):825-837. doi: 10.1177/0969733015583928. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Relevance and limits of the principle of "equivalence of care" in prison medicine.监狱医疗中“医疗等效性”原则的相关性与局限性
J Med Ethics. 2007 Oct;33(10):610-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018077.
9
[Psychedelics in psychiatry: an open debate].
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2025 Sep;93(9):343-351. doi: 10.1055/a-2453-0910. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
10
Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation.医疗资源分配伦理的可持续性原则。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):90-97. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106644. Epub 2020 Nov 5.