Yang Aiguo, Lin Rong, Xia Mingwei, Su Hao, He Ying
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital and Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Longquanyi, Chengdu, China.
Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1520585. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1520585. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) on pain and functional outcomes in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF).
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, web of science, physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of dry needling on plantar fasciitis. Article screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias evaluation were independently performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted based on different control methods and assessment time using RevMan 5.3 software.
A total of 12 RCTs involving 781 patients were included in the systemic review and meta-analysis. The comparison of DN + routine treatments vs. routine treatments alone demonstrated that PF patients receiving DN have significantly lower scores in Visual Analog Scale / Numerical Pain Rating Scale (VAS/NPRS) [95%CI (-2.12, -1.76), < 0.0001], and the scores of Foot Function Index (FFI) [95%CI (-12.57, -3.58), = 0.004]. In the comparison of DN vs. other treatments, results showed that DN significantly lowered the scores of FFI [95%CI (-6.55, -1.09), = 0.006]. However, there was no significant difference in pain improvement between DN and other treatments [95%CI (-0.66, 0.06), = 0.10]. In the meta-analysis based on different assessment time, results showed that there was significant difference in the scores of VAS/NPRS within 1 month, at 1 month and at over 1 month. But there was no significant difference in the scores of FFI within 1 month, while at 1 month and at over 1 month, the scores of FFI were lowered in patients receiving DN, and the difference were statistically significant.
Dry needling is effective in relieving pain and restoring function in patients with plantar fasciitis. Furthermore, dry needling may take at least 1 month to take effects in patients with plantar fasciitis. More multi-center RCTs with high-quality, large sample size are needed to further conform our conclusion.
评估干针疗法(DN)对足底筋膜炎(PF)患者疼痛及功能预后的有效性。
检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、EBSCO、科学网、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro),查找评估干针疗法对足底筋膜炎有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究者独立进行文献筛选、数据提取及偏倚风险评估。使用RevMan 5.3软件,基于不同对照方法及评估时间进行Meta分析。
系统评价及Meta分析共纳入12项RCT,涉及781例患者。干针疗法联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗比较显示,接受干针疗法的足底筋膜炎患者视觉模拟评分/数字疼痛评分量表(VAS/NPRS)得分显著更低[95%CI(-2.12,-1.76),<0.0001],足部功能指数(FFI)得分[95%CI(-12.57,-3.58),=0.004]。干针疗法与其他治疗比较结果显示,干针疗法显著降低了FFI得分[95%CI(-6.55,-1.09),=0.006]。然而,干针疗法与其他治疗在疼痛改善方面无显著差异[95%CI(-0.66,0.06),=0.10]。在基于不同评估时间的Meta分析中,结果显示在1个月内、1个月时及1个月后VAS/NPRS得分存在显著差异。但在1个月内FFI得分无显著差异,而在1个月时及1个月后,接受干针疗法患者的FFI得分降低,差异具有统计学意义。
干针疗法对缓解足底筋膜炎患者疼痛及恢复功能有效。此外,干针疗法对足底筋膜炎患者可能至少需要1个月才起效。需要更多高质量、大样本量的多中心RCT来进一步证实我们的结论。