• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在生态健康领域实现跨学科和多学科融合:来自多危机时代一个啮齿动物传播疾病项目的见解

Achieving inter- and transdisciplinarity in Ecohealth: insights from a rodent-borne disease project in a polycrisis era.

作者信息

Arpin Isabelle, Massart Clémence, Bourret Vincent, Castel Guillaume, Colombo Valeria Carolina, Eccard Jana, Firozpoor Jasmin, Grzybek Maciej, Henttonen Heikki A, Leirs Herwig, McManus Andrew, Roche Ben, Sironen Tarja, Sluydts Vincent, Stuart Peter, Zintl Annetta, Charbonnel Nathalie

机构信息

Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Paris, France.

University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 18;11:1235183. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1235183. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1235183
PMID:39744719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11688317/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inter- and transdisciplinary research (ITDR) is increasingly promoted to address "wicked problems", particularly in health sectors adopting approaches like Ecohealth. Our Ecohealth-inspired project on rodent-borne diseases, initiated just before the COVID-19 pandemic, provided an opportunity to evaluate ITDR implementation.

METHODS

We employed a recently developed semi-quantitative evaluation method to measure our project's success in achieving ITDR and analyzed factors influencing this achievement.

RESULTS

The project showed strengths in system description, team task allocation, and data sharing, but had lower scores in engaging societal actors throughout the project cycle.

DISCUSSION

We identified the underexplored influence of problem wickedness as a critical determinant of ITDR success. Addressing rodent-borne diseases, a less wicked problem, limited engagement potential but enabled constructive dialog with local actors. These insights are vital for addressing variably wicked problems in a polycrisis era. We propose recommendations to strengthen researchers' capacities, particularly in Ecohealth.

摘要

引言

跨学科和跨领域研究(ITDR)越来越多地被推广以解决“棘手问题”,特别是在采用生态健康等方法的卫生部门。我们受生态健康启发开展的关于鼠传疾病的项目,在新冠疫情爆发前启动,为评估ITDR的实施提供了一个机会。

方法

我们采用了一种最近开发的半定量评估方法来衡量我们项目在实现ITDR方面的成功程度,并分析影响这一成就的因素。

结果

该项目在系统描述、团队任务分配和数据共享方面表现出优势,但在整个项目周期中让社会行为者参与方面得分较低。

讨论

我们确定了问题棘手程度这一未被充分探索的影响因素是ITDR成功的关键决定因素。解决鼠传疾病这一棘手程度较低的问题,限制了参与潜力,但促成了与当地行为者的建设性对话。这些见解对于在多重危机时代解决不同程度的棘手问题至关重要。我们提出了加强研究人员能力的建议,特别是在生态健康领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/8b975bb0cec7/fvets-11-1235183-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/52761cdc10c6/fvets-11-1235183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/d8b600f69ffd/fvets-11-1235183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/8b975bb0cec7/fvets-11-1235183-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/52761cdc10c6/fvets-11-1235183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/d8b600f69ffd/fvets-11-1235183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de5/11688317/8b975bb0cec7/fvets-11-1235183-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Achieving inter- and transdisciplinarity in Ecohealth: insights from a rodent-borne disease project in a polycrisis era.在生态健康领域实现跨学科和多学科融合:来自多危机时代一个啮齿动物传播疾病项目的见解
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 18;11:1235183. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1235183. eCollection 2024.
2
Corrigendum: Achieving inter- and transdisciplinarity in Ecohealth: insights from a rodent-borne disease project in a polycrisis era.勘误:在生态健康领域实现跨学科和多学科融合:来自多危机时代一个啮齿动物传播疾病项目的见解。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 29;12:1560103. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1560103. eCollection 2025.
3
International, Transdisciplinary, and Ecohealth Action for Sustainable Agriculture in Asia.亚洲可持续农业的国际、跨学科和生态健康行动。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;9:592311. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.592311. eCollection 2021.
4
Identifying the impediments and enablers of ecohealth for a case study on health and environmental sanitation in Hà Nam, Vietnam.确定生态健康的障碍因素和促进因素,以开展越南河南省健康与环境卫生的案例研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2014 Oct 1;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-3-36. eCollection 2014.
5
Lessons from implementation of ecohealth projects in Southern Africa: A principal investigator's perspective.南部非洲生态健康项目实施的经验教训:一位首席研究员的视角
Acta Trop. 2017 Nov;175:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Ecohealth research in Southeast Asia: past, present and the way forward.东南亚生态健康研究:过去、现在与未来之路
Infect Dis Poverty. 2015 Jan 29;4:5. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-4-5. eCollection 2015.
7
On the road to 'research municipalities': analysing transdisciplinarity in municipal ecosystem services and adaptation planning.在通往“研究型城市”的道路上:剖析城市生态系统服务与适应规划中的跨学科性
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(3):765-784. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0499-0. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Transdisciplinary and social-ecological health frameworks-Novel approaches to emerging parasitic and vector-borne diseases.跨学科与社会生态健康框架——应对新出现的寄生虫病和媒介传播疾病的新方法。
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2019 Jan 11;4:e00084. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00084. eCollection 2019 Feb.
9
[Challenges for knowledge generation in environmental health: an ecosystemic approach].[环境卫生知识生成面临的挑战:一种生态系统方法]
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 May;18(5):1501-10.
10
'Changing climate, changing health, changing stories' profile: using an EcoHealth approach to explore impacts of climate change on inuit health.“变化的气候、变化的健康、变化的故事”专题:采用生态健康方法探讨气候变化对因纽特人健康的影响。
Ecohealth. 2012 Mar;9(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s10393-012-0762-x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing pandemics as super wicked problems: lessons from, and for, COVID-19 and the climate crisis.将大流行病作为超级棘手问题来应对:来自新冠疫情和气候危机的教训以及对它们的启示
Policy Sci. 2021;54(4):707-728. doi: 10.1007/s11077-021-09442-2. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
System Thinking and Citizen Participation Is Still Missing in One Health Initiatives - Lessons From Fifteen Evaluations.“同一健康”倡议仍缺乏系统思维和公民参与——来自十五项评估的经验教训
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;9:653398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653398. eCollection 2021.
3
Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development.
在可持续发展研究中,利益相关者互动有望达到一定程度。
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0507-4. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
4
A Systems Approach to Evaluate One Health Initiatives.一种评估“同一个健康”倡议的系统方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 9;5:23. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00023. eCollection 2018.
5
Zoonoses, One Health and complexity: wicked problems and constructive conflict.人畜共患病、同一健康与复杂性:棘手问题与建设性冲突
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 19;372(1725). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0171.
6
Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders.应对感染预防与控制中的棘手问题:与利益相关者共同创造的指南
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 May 21;5:20. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0119-2. eCollection 2016.
7
Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases.未来人畜共患疾病的啮齿动物宿主。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):7039-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501598112. Epub 2015 May 18.
8
Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health.啮齿动物传播的疾病及其对公共卫生的风险。
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(3):221-70. doi: 10.1080/10408410902989837.