Cvirn Gerhard, Hawliczek Anna, Schlagenhauf Axel, Brix Bianca, Zalaudek Karin Schmid, Schwaminger Sebastian, Paar Margret, Wonisch Willibald, Wagner Thomas, Arko Ziva, Goswami Nandu
Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Otto Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gravitational Physiology and Medicine Research Unit, Division of Physiology, Otto Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Physiol Rep. 2025 Jan;13(1):e70165. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70165.
Available evidence suggests that various medical/rehabilitation treatments evoke multiple effects on blood hemostasis. It was therefore the aim of our study to examine whether fascial manipulation, vibration exercise, motor imagery, or neuro-muscular electrical stimulation can activate the coagulation system, and, thereby, expose patients to thrombotic risk. Ten healthy young subject were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were obtained pre and posttreatment. Besides standard laboratory methods, calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) and thrombelastometry (TEM) were used allowing sensitive detection of hyper- and hypocoagulable states. Application of fascial manipulation, motor imagery, or neuro-muscular electrical stimulation had vitually no effect whereas a single bout of vibration exercise caused significant coagulation activation. For example, TEM-derived coagulation times were significantly shortened (209 ± 34 vs. 187 ± 41 s, p = 0.0098) and CAT-derived thrombin peaks were significantly higher (235 ± 88 vs. 268 ± 82 nM, p = 0.0020) in post compared with preexercise samples. Moreover, vibration exercise, motor imagery, and neuro-muscular electrical stimulation caused significant plasma expansion (6.15%, 7.53%, and 3.88% plasma volume changes, respectively). We conclude that vibrational exercise apparently represents a potential procoagulant stimulus, and ongoing studies have to clarify whether VE should be applied particularly to patients with an elevated risk for thrombosis.
现有证据表明,各种医学/康复治疗会对血液止血产生多种影响。因此,我们研究的目的是检查筋膜手法治疗、振动训练、运动想象或神经肌肉电刺激是否会激活凝血系统,从而使患者面临血栓形成风险。10名健康的年轻受试者参与了该研究。在治疗前后采集血样。除了标准实验室方法外,还使用了校准自动血栓形成测定法(CAT)和血栓弹力测定法(TEM),以灵敏检测高凝和低凝状态。筋膜手法治疗、运动想象或神经肌肉电刺激的应用几乎没有效果,而单次振动训练则引起了显著的凝血激活。例如,与运动前样本相比,运动后样本中TEM得出的凝血时间显著缩短(209±34秒对187±41秒,p = 0.0098),CAT得出的凝血酶峰值显著更高(235±88纳摩尔对268±82纳摩尔,p = 0.0020)。此外,振动训练、运动想象和神经肌肉电刺激引起了显著的血浆扩容(分别为血浆体积变化6.15%、7.53%和3.88%)。我们得出结论,振动训练显然是一种潜在的促凝刺激因素,后续研究必须阐明是否应特别对血栓形成风险升高的患者应用振动训练。