Beharry James, Yogendrakumar Vignan, Barros Guilherme W F, Davis Stephen M, Norrving Bo, Figtree Gemma A, Donnan Geoffrey, Euler Mia von, Eriksson Marie
Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Department of Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jan 2:23969873241309516. doi: 10.1177/23969873241309516.
Little is known of the long-term prognosis of patients with acute ischaemic stroke in the absence of standard modifiable stroke risk factors (SMoRFs). In acute coronary syndromes, patients without modifiable risk factors have a higher mortality rate. We analysed data from the Swedish Stroke Register to determine survival of patients without SMoRFs following an ischaemic stroke.
We identified adult patients with first-presentation acute ischaemic stroke between 2010 and 2020. Patients were considered to possess a SMoRF if they had one of: hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation or an active smoking history. We compared mortality in patients with and without SMoRFs following first-presentation ischaemic stroke using cox regression models. We also assessed the combined endpoint death and dependency (mRS 3-6) at 3 months via logistic regression models.
Of 152,588 patients with ischaemic stroke, hypertension (58.7%) and atrial fibrillation (27.3%) were the most common risk factors. 34,019 patients (22.3%) had no SMoRFs. After a first-presentation ischaemic stroke, patients without SMoRFs had a lower risk of death than patients with one or more SMoRFs (HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.57-0.59]). The absence of SMoRFs was associated with lower odds of death and dependency at 3 months in logistic regression models (OR 0·60 [95% CI 0.58-0.62]).
One in five patients with acute ischaemic stroke had no standard modifiable stroke risk factors. These patients have lower risk of death compared to patients with one or more SMoRFs.
对于没有标准可改变的卒中危险因素(SMoRFs)的急性缺血性卒中患者的长期预后,人们了解甚少。在急性冠状动脉综合征中,没有可改变危险因素的患者死亡率更高。我们分析了瑞典卒中登记处的数据,以确定缺血性卒中后无SMoRFs患者的生存率。
我们确定了2010年至2020年间首次出现急性缺血性卒中的成年患者。如果患者有以下情况之一,则被认为具有SMoRF:高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症、心房颤动或当前吸烟史。我们使用Cox回归模型比较首次出现缺血性卒中后有和没有SMoRFs患者的死亡率。我们还通过逻辑回归模型评估了3个月时死亡和依赖(改良Rankin量表3 - 6分)的联合终点。
在152,588例缺血性卒中患者中,高血压(58.7%)和心房颤动(27.3%)是最常见的危险因素。34,019例患者(22.3%)没有SMoRFs。首次出现缺血性卒中后,没有SMoRFs的患者死亡风险低于有一个或多个SMoRFs的患者(风险比0.58 [95%置信区间0.57 - 0.59])。在逻辑回归模型中,没有SMoRFs与3个月时死亡和依赖的较低几率相关(比值比0.60 [95%置信区间0.58 - 0.62])。
五分之一的急性缺血性卒中患者没有标准可改变的卒中危险因素。与有一个或多个SMoRFs的患者相比,这些患者的死亡风险更低。