• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimating optimal thresholds for adherence to RASA medications among older adults with hypertension.估算老年高血压患者服用RASA药物依从性的最佳阈值。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jan;31(1):25-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.1.25.
2
Estimating the economic impact of blister-packaging on medication adherence and health care costs for a Medicare Advantage health plan.估算泡罩包装对医疗保险优势健康计划药物依从性和医疗保健成本的经济影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Dec;30(12):1442-1454. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.24179. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Evaluation of an integrated adherence program aimed to increase Medicare Part D star rating measures.评估旨在提高医疗保险部分 D 星级评定措施的综合依从性计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1193-203. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.12.1193.
4
Impact of medication synchronization programs on proportion of days covered (PDC) scores and Medicare Part D medication-related adherence metrics.药物同步化计划对覆盖天数(PDC)评分和医疗保险部分 D 药物相关遵医嘱指标的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
A Multichannel Medication Adherence Intervention Influences Patient and Prescriber Behavior.多通道药物依从性干预影响患者和处方行为。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):526-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.526.
6
The Influence of a Community Pharmacy Automatic Prescription Refill Program on Medicare Part D Adherence Metrics.社区药房自动处方续方计划对医疗保险处方药依从性指标的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):801-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.801.
7
A Pharmacist Telephone Intervention to Identify Adherence Barriers and Improve Adherence Among Nonadherent Patients with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes in a Medicare Advantage Plan.一项药师电话干预措施,旨在识别依从性障碍并提高医疗保险优势计划中患有高血压和糖尿病合并症的非依从患者的依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):63-73. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.63.
8
Assessing the association between medication adherence, as defined in quality measures, and disease-state control, health care utilization, and costs in a retrospective database analysis of Medicare supplemental beneficiaries using statin medications.在使用他汀类药物的 Medicare 补充受益人的回顾性数据库分析中,评估质量措施中定义的药物依从性与疾病控制、医疗保健利用和成本之间的关联。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12):1529-1537. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1529.
9
Association of Changes in Medication Use and Adherence With Accountable Care Organization Exposure in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or Diabetes.心血管疾病或糖尿病患者药物使用和依从性变化与问责制医疗组织暴露的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;2(9):1019-1023. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2172.
10
Medication adherence star ratings measures, health care resource utilization, and cost.药物依从性星级评定指标、医疗资源利用和成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 May;30(5):210-217. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89538.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact and Continued Relevance of Medication Adherence Measurement.
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Aug;25(4):575-578. doi: 10.1089/pop.2022.0022. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
A Literature Review of Productivity Loss Associated with Hypertension in the United States.美国高血压相关生产力损失的文献综述。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Jun;25(3):297-308. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0201. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?是否到了更换星级依从性测量方法的时候了?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):399-404. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.399.
4
Associations of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonist Medication Adherence and Economic Outcomes Among Commercially Insured US Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.商业保险覆盖的美国成年人中,肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂药物治疗依从性和经济结果的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e016094. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016094. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
Impact of Star Rating Medication Adherence Measures on Adherence for Targeted and Nontargeted Medications.星级药物依从性测量对靶向和非靶向药物依从性的影响。
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1266-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Cost of Prescription Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality.与处方药相关的发病率和死亡率的成本。
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Sep;52(9):829-837. doi: 10.1177/1060028018765159. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
7
Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review.按疾病分组的药物治疗不依从的经济影响:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e016982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016982.
8
Impact of Medication Adherence on Health Services Utilization in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中药物依从性对卫生服务利用的影响。
Med Care. 2018 Mar;56(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000870.
9
The impact of medication adherence on clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.药物依从性对冠状动脉疾病临床结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(9):962-970. doi: 10.1177/2047487317695628. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
10
Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015.全球 1990-2015 年高血压和收缩压至少为 110 至 115mmHg 的负担
JAMA. 2017 Jan 10;317(2):165-182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043.

估算老年高血压患者服用RASA药物依从性的最佳阈值。

Estimating optimal thresholds for adherence to RASA medications among older adults with hypertension.

作者信息

Parikh Megha A, Ramachandran Sujith, Nsiah Irene, Campbell Patrick J, Castora-Binkley Melissa, Karmakar Taruja, Black Heather, Bentley John P

机构信息

Pharmacy Quality Alliance, Alexandria, VA.

University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jan;31(1):25-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.1.25.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.1.25
PMID:39745842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695845/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Star Ratings program incentivizes health plans in Medicare to improve performance on a variety of quality measures such as adherence to renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASAs). Adherence to RASA medications, defined as having a proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%, has been improving for several years, suggesting that further investigation is needed to assess the appropriateness of the current 80% PDC threshold for medication adherence as an indicator of quality. The 80% PDC threshold has been found to be associated with improved health care resource utilization outcomes; however, little evidence exists to show that this threshold is optimal.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between adherence to RASA medications and health care resource utilization outcomes within a Medicare Advantage population and to identify the optimal PDC threshold that maximizes economic and utilization benefits.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used de-identified administrative claims data from the 2015 to 2018 in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Inclusion in the study was based on measure specifications for the RASA adherence measure used in the Medicare Part D Star Ratings program. Adherence was assessed over a 1-year period, and health care utilization and medical costs were assessed in the subsequent year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between adherence and economic outcomes after accounting for hypothesized confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1,006,901 individuals were included in the study with an average PDC of 87.5% (SD = 17.8%). During the follow-up period, 12.1% of individuals experienced a hospitalization, 14.81% used an emergency department (ED), and 32.3% visited a non-ED outpatient facility. Each percentage point increase in PDC was significantly associated with decreased odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.997; 95% CI = 0.997-0.997) and ED visit (OR = 0.997; 95% CI = 0.996-0.997), being in the top decile of payer medical costs (OR = 0.998; 95% CI = 0.997-0.998), and increased odds of outpatient visits (adjusted OR = 1.001; 95% CI = 1.001-1.002). Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses found the optimal PDC thresholds to be 91.5%, 90.7%, 90.7%, and 90.4% for hospitalization (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.527), ED visit (AUC = 0.534), outpatient visit (AUC = 0.501), and medical costs (AUC = 0.532), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the importance of medication adherence for preventing undesirable outcomes, such as future hospitalizations, ED visits, and high medical costs, among individuals with hypertension enrolled in Medicare Advantage. The optimal threshold for PDC related to health care resource utilization outcomes was found to be greater than that used in the measure in CMS Star Ratings. Future research should examine the impact of changes in adherence thresholds for economic and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的星级评定计划激励医疗保险中的健康计划在多种质量指标上提高绩效,如肾素 - 血管紧张素系统拮抗剂(RASAs)的依从性。RASA药物的依从性定义为覆盖天数比例(PDC)至少为80%,多年来一直在提高,这表明需要进一步调查,以评估当前80%的PDC阈值作为药物依从性质量指标的适宜性。已发现80%的PDC阈值与改善医疗资源利用结果相关;然而,几乎没有证据表明该阈值是最佳的。

目的

评估医疗保险优势人群中RASA药物依从性与医疗资源利用结果之间的关联,并确定能使经济和利用效益最大化的最佳PDC阈值。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了Optum的去识别化临床信息数据集市数据库中2015年至2018年的去识别化管理索赔数据。纳入研究基于医疗保险D部分星级评定计划中使用的RASA依从性指标的测量规范。在1年期间评估依从性,并在随后一年评估医疗资源利用和医疗费用。在考虑假设的混杂因素后,使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估依从性与经济结果之间的关系。

结果

共有1,006,901人纳入研究,平均PDC为87.5%(标准差 = 17.8%)。在随访期间,12.1%的人住院,14.81%的人使用过急诊科(ED),32.3%的人就诊于非急诊科门诊机构。PDC每增加一个百分点,与住院几率降低(优势比[OR] = 0.997;95%置信区间 = 0.997 - 0.997)、ED就诊几率降低(OR = 0.997;95%置信区间 = 0.996 - 0.997)、处于支付方医疗费用最高十分位的几率降低(OR = 0.998;95%置信区间 = 0.997 - 0.998)以及门诊就诊几率增加(调整后OR = 1.001;95%置信区间 = 1.001 - 1.