Suppr超能文献

低于目标范围的时间及其对低血糖感知和严重低血糖的影响:来自英国临床糖尿病学家协会研究的见解

Time Below Range and Its Influence on Hypoglycemia Awareness and Severe Hypoglycemia: Insights From the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists Study.

作者信息

Deshmukh Harshal, Wilmot Emma G, Choudhary Pratik, Ssemmondo Emmanuel, Barnes Dennis, Walker Neil, Walton Chris, Ryder Robert E J, Sathyapalan Thozhukat

机构信息

James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):437-443. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1833.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the relationship between time below range (TBR), impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), and severe hypoglycemia (SH).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed data from individuals with diabetes using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists audit. Hypoglycemia awareness was assessed via the Gold score (≥4 denoting IAH), and SH was defined as hypoglycemia requiring third-party assistance. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between TBR percentage (<70 mg/dL; 3.9 mmol/L) at first follow-up and follow-up Gold score and SH incidence. The Youden J index identified optimal TBR percentage cutoffs for detecting IAH and SH.

RESULTS

The study included 15,777 participants, with follow-up TBR and SH data available for 5,029. The median TBR percentage was 4% (interquartile range 2-6.6%), with 42% meeting the recommended TBR of ≤4%. Adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, TBR was significantly associated with SH (P < 0.001) and IAH (P = 0.005). Optimal TBR cutoffs for identifying IAH and SH were 3.35% and 3.95%, yielding negative predictive value (NPV) values of 85% and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the international consensus recommending a TBR of <4% in type 1 diabetes, with high NPV values suggesting the utility of TBR in screening for SH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨低于目标范围时间(TBR)、低血糖意识受损(IAH)和严重低血糖(SH)之间的关系。

研究设计与方法

这项横断面研究分析了英国临床糖尿病学家协会审核中使用连续血糖监测仪(CGM)的糖尿病患者的数据。通过Gold评分评估低血糖意识(≥4表示IAH),SH定义为需要第三方协助的低血糖。采用逻辑回归确定首次随访时TBR百分比(<70 mg/dL;3.9 mmol/L)与随访Gold评分及SH发生率之间的关联。约登指数确定了检测IAH和SH的最佳TBR百分比临界值。

结果

该研究纳入了15777名参与者,其中5029名有随访TBR和SH数据。TBR百分比中位数为4%(四分位间距2 - 6.6%),42%的人符合推荐的TBR≤4%。经年龄、性别和BMI校正后,TBR与SH(P < 0.001)和IAH(P = 0.005)显著相关。识别IAH和SH的最佳TBR临界值分别为3.35%和3.95%,阴性预测值(NPV)分别为85%和97%。

结论

我们的研究结果支持国际共识,即建议1型糖尿病患者的TBR<4%,高NPV值表明TBR在筛查SH方面的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be24/11870288/fdbfcd2a1afd/dc241833F0GA.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验