Audette Pierre-Louis, Côté Laurianne, Blais Caroline, Duncan Justin, Gingras Francis, Fiset Daniel
Département de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, J8X3X7, Canada.
Cognition. 2025 Mar;256:106057. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106057. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
This study aimed to assess the roles of part-based and holistic processing for face processing ability (FPA). A psychophysical paradigm in which the efficiency at recognizing isolated or combined facial parts was used (N = 64), and holistic processing was defined as the perceptual integration from multiple parts. FPA and object processing ability were measured using a battery of tasks. A multiple linear regression including three predictors, namely perceptual integration, part-based efficiency, and object processing, explained 40 % of the variance in FPA. Most importantly, our results reveal a strong predictive relationship between part-based efficiency and FPA, a small predictive relationship between object processing ability and FPA, and no predictive relationship between perceptual integration and FPA. This result was obtained despite considerable variance in perceptual integration skills-with some participants exhibiting a highly efficient integration. These results indicate that part-based processing plays a pivotal role in FPA, whereas holistic processing does not.
本研究旨在评估基于部分的加工和整体加工对面部加工能力(FPA)的作用。采用了一种心理物理学范式,其中使用识别孤立或组合面部部分的效率(N = 64),并且整体加工被定义为来自多个部分的知觉整合。使用一系列任务测量FPA和物体加工能力。一个包含三个预测变量的多元线性回归,即知觉整合、基于部分的效率和物体加工,解释了FPA中40%的方差。最重要的是,我们的结果揭示了基于部分的效率与FPA之间有很强的预测关系,物体加工能力与FPA之间有较小的预测关系,而知觉整合与FPA之间没有预测关系。尽管知觉整合技能存在相当大的差异——一些参与者表现出高效的整合,但仍获得了这一结果。这些结果表明,基于部分的加工在FPA中起关键作用,而整体加工则不然。