• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于响应面法的陶瓷玻璃地质聚合物砂浆配合比设计与性能的试验研究

Experimental studies on mix design and properties of ceramic-glass geopolymer mortars using response surface methodology.

作者信息

Pourabbas Bilondi Meysam, Ghaffarian Vahideh, Amiri Daluee Mahdi, Pakizehrooh Reyhaneh, Hosseini Tazik Saeed, Behzadian Alireza, Zaresefat Mojtaba

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran.

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environment, Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82658-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-82658-3
PMID:39747308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11696182/
Abstract

This study explores the mechanical properties of geopolymer mortars incorporating ceramic and glass powders sourced from industrial waste. A Box-Behnken design was employed to assess the effects of ceramic waste powder (CWP) content, alkaline activator ratio, solution-to-binder (S: B) ratio, and oven curing duration on the mortar's performance. Compressive strengths were measured at 3 and 28 days, and regression models were developed to predict these outcomes. The relationships between compressive strength, flexural strength, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) were also analyzed. Microstructural and molecular changes were investigated using scanning electron microscopy and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. According to response surface methodology results, the maximum compressive strengths of 22.79 MPa at three days and 25 MPa at 28 days were achieved using a mix containing 85.8% CWP, a 1.02 sodium hydroxide (NH): sodium silicate (NS) ratio, a 0.647 S: B ratio, and a 12-h oven curing time. Optimal oven curing conditions resulted in 28-day compressive strength, flexural strength, and UPV values of 25.7 MPa, 5.62 MPa, and 5765 m/s, respectively..

摘要

本研究探讨了掺入源自工业废料的陶瓷和玻璃粉末的地质聚合物砂浆的力学性能。采用Box-Behnken设计来评估陶瓷废料粉末（CWP）含量、碱性活化剂比例、溶液与粘结剂（S:B）比例以及烘箱养护时间对砂浆性能的影响。在3天和28天时测量抗压强度，并建立回归模型来预测这些结果。还分析了抗压强度、抗折强度和超声波脉冲速度（UPV）之间的关系。使用扫描电子显微镜和傅里叶变换红外光谱研究微观结构和分子变化。根据响应面法结果，使用含有85.8% CWP、氢氧化钠（NH）与硅酸钠（NS）比例为1.02、S:B比例为0.647且烘箱养护时间为12小时的混合物，在3天时获得了22.79 MPa的最大抗压强度，在28天时获得了25 MPa的最大抗压强度。最佳烘箱养护条件下，28天的抗压强度、抗折强度和UPV值分别为25.7 MPa、5.62 MPa和5765 m/s。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/1c9ea96c99e1/41598_2024_82658_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/7e1231956864/41598_2024_82658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/338700e69786/41598_2024_82658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/daa2f40df1c5/41598_2024_82658_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/1c60df838df0/41598_2024_82658_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/03b7c8bb9502/41598_2024_82658_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/7e525b1d2524/41598_2024_82658_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/ac2ab42bcb3a/41598_2024_82658_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/b5156be5ff18/41598_2024_82658_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/cc36ea39ed74/41598_2024_82658_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/446afef15a70/41598_2024_82658_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/e75581707083/41598_2024_82658_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/cf5e40f38fcc/41598_2024_82658_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/8a36f607fdac/41598_2024_82658_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/ce1f534b1b97/41598_2024_82658_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/c013d4fab729/41598_2024_82658_Fig15a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/5c424045ceac/41598_2024_82658_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/be762b5ab0da/41598_2024_82658_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/1c9ea96c99e1/41598_2024_82658_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/7e1231956864/41598_2024_82658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/338700e69786/41598_2024_82658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/daa2f40df1c5/41598_2024_82658_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/1c60df838df0/41598_2024_82658_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/03b7c8bb9502/41598_2024_82658_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/7e525b1d2524/41598_2024_82658_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/ac2ab42bcb3a/41598_2024_82658_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/b5156be5ff18/41598_2024_82658_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/cc36ea39ed74/41598_2024_82658_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/446afef15a70/41598_2024_82658_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/e75581707083/41598_2024_82658_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/cf5e40f38fcc/41598_2024_82658_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/8a36f607fdac/41598_2024_82658_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/ce1f534b1b97/41598_2024_82658_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/c013d4fab729/41598_2024_82658_Fig15a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/5c424045ceac/41598_2024_82658_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/be762b5ab0da/41598_2024_82658_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c7/11696182/1c9ea96c99e1/41598_2024_82658_Fig18_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental studies on mix design and properties of ceramic-glass geopolymer mortars using response surface methodology.基于响应面法的陶瓷玻璃地质聚合物砂浆配合比设计与性能的试验研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82658-3.
2
Artificial intelligence prediction of the mechanical properties of banana peel-ash and bagasse blended geopolymer concrete.香蕉皮灰与甘蔗渣混合地质聚合物混凝土力学性能的人工智能预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77144-9.
3
Effect of blast furnace slag on the fresh and hardened properties of volcanic tuff-based geopolymer mortars.高炉矿渣对凝灰岩基地质聚合物砂浆新拌及硬化性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 21;15(1):13651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98382-5.
4
Mechanical Properties of a Sustainable Low-Carbon Geopolymer Concrete Using a Pumice-Derived Sodium Silicate Solution.使用浮石衍生硅酸钠溶液的可持续低碳地质聚合物混凝土的力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 13;17(8):1792. doi: 10.3390/ma17081792.
5
Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes.系统的多尺度模型预测各种混合比例和养护制度下粉煤灰基地聚物混凝土的抗压强度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 14;16(6):e0253006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253006. eCollection 2021.
6
Flexural Performance and Microstructural Studies of Trough-Shaped Geopolymer Ferrocement Panels.槽形地聚合物钢丝网水泥板的抗弯性能及微观结构研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 9;15(16):5477. doi: 10.3390/ma15165477.
7
Synthesis of Geopolymer from a Novel Aluminosilicate-Based Natural Soil Precursor Using Electric Oven Curing for Improved Mechanical Strength.使用电烘箱养护由新型铝硅酸盐基天然土壤前驱体制备地质聚合物以提高机械强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;15(21):7757. doi: 10.3390/ma15217757.
8
Evaluation and Multi-Objective Optimization of Lightweight Mortars Parameters at Elevated Temperature via Box-Behnken Optimization Approach.基于Box-Behnken优化方法的轻质砂浆在高温下参数的评估与多目标优化
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;14(23):7405. doi: 10.3390/ma14237405.
9
Mechanical Framework for Geopolymer Gels Construction: An Optimized LSTM Technique to Predict Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Gels Concrete.地质聚合物凝胶结构的力学框架：一种用于预测粉煤灰基地质聚合物凝胶混凝土抗压强度的优化长短期记忆网络技术
Gels. 2024 Feb 16;10(2):148. doi: 10.3390/gels10020148.
10
Optimization Design of MK-GGBS Based Geopolymer Repairing Mortar Based on Response Surface Methodology.基于响应面法的MK-GGBS基地质聚合物修补砂浆优化设计
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;16(5):1889. doi: 10.3390/ma16051889.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization Design of MK-GGBS Based Geopolymer Repairing Mortar Based on Response Surface Methodology.基于响应面法的MK-GGBS基地质聚合物修补砂浆优化设计
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;16(5):1889. doi: 10.3390/ma16051889.
2
Multiscale Characterization at Early Ages of Ultra-High Performance Geopolymer Concrete.超高性能地质聚合物混凝土早期的多尺度表征
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;14(24):5504. doi: 10.3390/polym14245504.
3
Assessment of Destructive and Nondestructive Analysis for GGBS Based Geopolymer Concrete and Its Statistical Analysis.
基于粒化高炉矿渣的地质聚合物混凝土的破坏性与非破坏性分析评估及其统计分析
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;14(15):3132. doi: 10.3390/polym14153132.
4
Optimization of Alkaline Activator on the Strength Properties of Geopolymer Concrete.碱性激发剂对地质聚合物混凝土强度性能的优化
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;14(12):2434. doi: 10.3390/polym14122434.
5
Assessment of the Suitability of Ceramic Waste in Geopolymer Composites: An Appraisal.地质聚合物复合材料中陶瓷废料适用性的评估：一项评价
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 14;14(12):3279. doi: 10.3390/ma14123279.
6
Properties of high-calcium and low-calcium fly ash combination geopolymer mortar containing recycled aggregate.含再生骨料的高钙与低钙粉煤灰复合地质聚合物砂浆的性能
Heliyon. 2019 Sep 30;5(9):e02513. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02513. eCollection 2019 Sep.