Waters Austin R, Kent Erin E, Murray Camille R, Jones Shaun R, Warner Echo L, Coombs Lorinda A, Donovan Heidi, Nichols Hazel B, Wheeler Stephanie B, Rosenstein Donald L, Roberson Mya L, Tan Kelly R
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251351105. doi: 10.1177/10732748251351105. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
IntroductionEmployment changes among cancer caregivers are common and can result in financial hardship. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other identities outside of cisgender heterosexual (LGBTQ+) individuals are more likely to live in poverty and experience workplace discrimination than non-LGBTQ+ individuals. This study aimed to assess the impact of caregiving-related employment changes and anti-LGBTQ+ stigma on financial hardship and describe lived experiences with financial hardship and related employment changes among LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers.MethodsAn explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted and included a national survey and individual interviews with survey participants. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the association of employment changes with financial hardship. An inductive qualitative analysis guided by two of the three domains of financial hardship (ie, material and behavioral) was conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated throughout the study.ResultsA total of N = 332 LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers participated in the survey, and N = 14 participated in an interview. The average modified COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity and Caregiver Reaction Assessment financial sub-scale were 25.6 (SD: 9.9, Range: 1-44) and 2.99 (SD: 1.0, Range: 1-5). Employment changes (OR: 3.32, 95% CI: 1.73-6.36) and anti-LGBTQ+ stigma (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.47-3.32) were associated with high financial hardship. Three overarching themes from the qualitative analysis included: 1) Financial Hardship: Increased Costs, Strained Finances, and Lost Wages; 2) Caregiving as an LGBTQ+ Person: Stigma, Outness, and Expectations; and 3) Financial Unmet needs and Recommendations.ConclusionLGBTQ+ cancer caregivers experience substantial financial hardship that is associated with employment changes and anti-LGBTQ+ stigma. LGBTQ + cancer caregivers reported varying levels of outness and acceptance that directly influenced their access to financial support. Cancer-related financial hardship interventions tailored to the needs of LGBTQ+ individuals are needed.
引言
癌症护理者的就业变化很常见,可能导致经济困难。女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿以及其他非顺性别异性恋身份的人(LGBTQ+)比非LGBTQ+的人更有可能生活在贫困中并遭受职场歧视。本研究旨在评估与护理相关的就业变化和反LGBTQ+污名对经济困难的影响,并描述LGBTQ+癌症护理者在经济困难及相关就业变化方面的实际经历。
方法
开展了一项解释性混合方法研究,包括一项全国性调查以及对调查参与者的个人访谈。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验就业变化与经济困难之间的关联。以经济困难的三个领域中的两个领域(即物质和行为)为指导进行归纳定性分析。在整个研究过程中对定量和定性数据进行整合。
结果
共有N = 332名LGBTQ+癌症护理者参与了调查,N = 14名参与了访谈。财务毒性综合评分修正版和护理者反应评估财务子量表的平均分分别为25.6(标准差:9.9,范围:1 - 44)和2.99(标准差:1.0,范围:1 - 5)。就业变化(比值比:3.32,95%置信区间:1.73 - 6.36)和反LGBTQ+污名(比值比:2.21,95%置信区间:1.47 - 3.32)与高经济困难相关。定性分析得出的三个总体主题包括:1)经济困难:成本增加、资金紧张和工资损失;2)作为LGBTQ+人士的护理经历:污名、公开身份和期望;3)未满足的财务需求及建议。
结论
LGBTQ+癌症护理者经历了与就业变化和反LGBTQ+污名相关的重大经济困难。LGBTQ +癌症护理者报告了不同程度的公开身份和接受程度,这直接影响了他们获得经济支持的机会。需要针对LGBTQ+个体的需求制定与癌症相关的经济困难干预措施。