Kang Sun Hyung, Moon Hee Seok, Sung Jae Kyu, Kim Sun Moon, Kim Ki Bae, Lee Seung Woo, Cho Young Sin, Bang Ki Bae, Song Kyung Ho
Department of Gastroenterology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):168. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84065-0.
In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) whose symptoms improve with acid-suppression therapy, on-demand treatment could constitute maintenance therapy. This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of on-demand tegoprazan and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in GERD. From six university hospitals in the Daejeon-Chungcheong region, we enrolled patients with GERD who had experienced symptomatic improvement with acid-suppressive therapy and, using a randomization table, randomly allocated these participants to two groups: to receive either tegoprazan 50 mg + esomeprazole placebo or tegoprazan placebo + esomeprazole 20 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint of this study was the intergroup difference in patient satisfaction with on-demand therapy. Among the 69 participants who completed 8 weeks of on-demand therapy and rated patient satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale, the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups scored an average of 4.31 and 4.15 points, respectively, without any significant intergroup difference. In the tegoprazan group, 26.2% (182/694) of those with episodes experienced symptom improvement within 30 min, which is a significantly higher proportion compared to 16.1% (104/646) in the esomeprazole group. Compared to the esomeprazole group, the tegoprazan group had a significantly shorter time to symptom improvement overall and a significantly higher proportion of patients who improved within 30 min. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Tegoprazan is effective as on-demand therapy for GERD and offers the expectation of faster symptom improvement than with PPIs. Clinical trial KCT0009296, registered at cris.nih.go.kr.
在症状通过抑酸治疗得到改善的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者中,按需治疗可构成维持治疗。本研究调查了按需服用替戈拉赞与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗GERD的疗效和安全性比较。从大田 - 忠清地区的六所大学医院,我们招募了症状通过抑酸治疗得到改善的GERD患者,并使用随机数字表将这些参与者随机分为两组:分别接受50毫克替戈拉赞 + 埃索美拉唑安慰剂或替戈拉赞安慰剂 + 20毫克埃索美拉唑。本研究的主要终点是两组患者对按需治疗的满意度差异。在完成8周按需治疗并采用5分李克特量表对患者满意度进行评分的69名参与者中,替戈拉赞组和埃索美拉唑组的平均得分分别为4.31分和4.15分,两组间无显著差异。在替戈拉赞组中,发作患者中有26.2%(182/694)在30分钟内症状得到改善,这一比例显著高于埃索美拉唑组的16.1%(104/646)。与埃索美拉唑组相比,替戈拉赞组总体症状改善时间显著更短,30分钟内症状改善的患者比例显著更高。未报告严重的治疗突发不良事件。替戈拉赞作为GERD的按需治疗有效,且有望比PPI更快改善症状。临床试验KCT0009296,注册于cris.nih.go.kr。