Galema Gerbrich, Brouwer Jasperina, Bouwkamp-Timmer Tineke, Jaarsma Debbie A D C, Wietasch Götz J K G, Duvivier Robbert R J
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06565-x.
The transition to residency (TTR) goes along with new opportunities for learning and development, which can also be challenging, despite the availability of preparation courses designed to ease the transition process. Although the TTR highly depends on the organization, individual combined with organizational strategies that advance adaptation are rarely investigated. This study explores residents' strategies and experiences with organizational strategies to help them adapt to residency.
We conducted a template analysis of interview transcripts with 16 second-year residents from different hospital-based specialties in the Netherlands. To identify residents' perceptions of their own and other healthcare professionals' strategies, our template consisted of the individual and organizational strategies originating from the Organizational Socialization theory.
Residents employed five individual strategies: observing, asking questions, establishing social relationships, and seeking information. These strategies helped them learn their tasks, appropriate behaviors, and integrate into their teams. On the organizational side, residents experienced six strategies, mapped through Organizational Socialization theory. Collective-individual: whether the residents felt they were treated as a group or as individuals. Formal-informal: whether the introduction period was formal, structured and explicit, or implicit and unstructured. Sequential-random: whether guidance was aligned with training levels or approached inconsistently. Fixed-variable: whether the residency program followed a fixed timeline or a flexible structure. Serial-disjunctive whether role models or experienced professionals were available for guidance or not. Investiture-divestiture: whether the healthcare team embraced residents' individuality or emphasized residents' conformity to norms. Factors influencing TTR included individual strategies, such as establishing social relationships, and organizational strategies, particularly interactional (relationships with healthcare professionals) and systemic strategies (training program structure). Residents' perceptions varied on whether these strategies facilitated or hindered their TTR.
TTR involves dynamic interactions between residents and healthcare professionals, bridging individual and organizational strategies. This largely unexplored interaction adds a new dimension to Organizational Socialization theory. Importantly, residents' perceptions of these strategies varied: some thrived with independence, while others needed structured guidance. This suggests that residency programs should customize support to individual needs, balancing support and autonomy to improve transitions and enhance training.
向住院医师阶段的过渡(TTR)伴随着学习与发展的新机遇,尽管有旨在缓解过渡过程的预备课程,但这一过程仍可能具有挑战性。虽然TTR很大程度上取决于组织,但很少有人研究个体与促进适应的组织策略相结合的情况。本研究探讨住院医师的策略以及组织策略方面的经验,以帮助他们适应住院医师阶段。
我们对来自荷兰不同医院专科的16名二年级住院医师的访谈记录进行了模板分析。为了确定住院医师对自身及其他医疗专业人员策略的看法,我们的模板由源自组织社会化理论的个体和组织策略组成。
住院医师采用了五种个体策略:观察、提问、建立社会关系和寻求信息。这些策略帮助他们学习任务、掌握适当行为并融入团队。在组织方面,住院医师经历了通过组织社会化理论梳理出的六种策略。集体 - 个体:住院医师是否感觉自己被当作一个群体或个体对待。正式 - 非正式:入职期是正式、结构化且明确的,还是隐含且无结构的。顺序 - 随机:指导是否与培训水平相匹配或方式不一致。固定 - 可变:住院医师培训项目是遵循固定的时间表还是灵活的结构。连续 - 间断:是否有榜样或经验丰富的专业人员可供指导。授予 - 剥夺:医疗团队是接纳住院医师的个性还是强调住院医师对规范的遵从。影响TTR的因素包括个体策略,如建立社会关系,以及组织策略,特别是互动策略(与医疗专业人员的关系)和系统策略(培训项目结构)。住院医师对这些策略是促进还是阻碍他们的TTR看法不一。
TTR涉及住院医师与医疗专业人员之间的动态互动,连接个体和组织策略。这种在很大程度上未被探索的互动为组织社会化理论增添了新维度。重要的是,住院医师对这些策略的看法各不相同:一些人在独立状态下茁壮成长,而另一些人则需要结构化指导。这表明住院医师培训项目应根据个体需求定制支持,平衡支持与自主性,以改善过渡并加强培训。