Suppr超能文献

教育水平对中风患者罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)评分的影响分析。

An analysis of the influence of education level on Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) scores among stroke patients.

作者信息

Wang Ya, Zhang Yu, Zhang Yi

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.

出版信息

Psychogeriatrics. 2025 Jan;25(1):e13224. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13224.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of education level on scores in the Mandarin Chinese version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) among stroke patients and to provide guidance regarding the application and optimisation of the RUDAS.

METHODS

A total of 235 stroke patients were census sampled for an evaluation of cognitive function using the Mandarin Chinese version of the RUDAS. A test was carried out to analyze the differences in RUDAS scores between sexes, and one-way analysis of variance and the Scheffe multiple comparison test were used to analyze the differences in RUDAS scores between age groups and between education levels. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was performed using logistic regression. If P < 0.05, then an item was considered to exhibit DIF.

RESULTS

The overall education levels of the stroke patients were moderate. There was no significant difference in RUDAS scores based on education level or sex, but there was a difference between age groups. There were three items that exhibited DIF: square, internal line and external line.

CONCLUSION

RUDAS scores were not strongly influenced by education level, and most items were suitable for screening among stroke patients with different education levels. However, when drawing a cube, differences in education level should be taken into consideration.

摘要

目的

探讨教育水平对中风患者中文版罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)评分的影响,并为RUDAS的应用和优化提供指导。

方法

采用中文版RUDAS对235例中风患者进行认知功能普查抽样评估。进行测试以分析不同性别之间RUDAS评分的差异,并采用单因素方差分析和谢弗多重比较检验分析不同年龄组和不同教育水平之间RUDAS评分的差异。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计分析。采用逻辑回归进行差异项目功能(DIF)分析。如果P<0.05,则认为一个项目表现出DIF。

结果

中风患者的总体教育水平中等。基于教育水平或性别的RUDAS评分无显著差异,但不同年龄组之间存在差异。有三个项目表现出DIF:正方形、内线和外线。

结论

RUDAS评分受教育水平的影响不大,大多数项目适用于不同教育水平的中风患者筛查。然而,在绘制立方体时,应考虑教育水平的差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Cognitive reserve.认知储备
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:181-190. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00011-X.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验