Suppr超能文献

用于人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒1型相关脊髓病姿势康复的直流电前庭刺激

Galvanic vestibular stimulation for the postural rehabilitation of HTLV-1-associated myelopathy.

作者信息

Silva Tatiana Rocha, Labanca Ludimila, Caporali Júlia Fonseca de Morais, Tavares Mauricio Campelo, Rausse Nathália de Castro Botini, de Almeida Maria Júlia Amaral Abranches, Martins Maxmilliam de Souza, Amorim Laura Fernandes, Sitibaldi Léo Dantas, Gonçalves Denise Utsch

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fonoaudiológicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 19;18:1507559. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1507559. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and noninvasive method of neurostimulation that can be used to improve body balance. Several central nervous system diseases cause alterations in body balance, including HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM).

OBJECTIVE

To test GVS as a balance rehabilitation strategy for HAM.

METHODS

This study is a quasi-experimental clinical trial in which postural balance was compared before and after a GVS rehabilitation protocol applied to 20 patients with HAM, 12 women and 8 men, average age of 78 and 79 years, respectively. They were followed for nine months after the end of the GVS protocol, which consisted of one GVS session per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The GVS current intensity was progressively increased from 1.0 milliamperes (mA) to 3.5 mA until the third session and maintained at 3.5 mA until the 12th session. The electrical stimulation time progressively increased from 9 min in the first session to 18 min in the second session and maintained at 30 min from the third session onwards. Postural balance was assessed by Time up and go test (TUG), Berg balance scale (BBS) and posturography that were performed before the beginning of the intervention, during the intervention (6th week), at the end of the intervention (12th week) and after 9 months of follow-up without electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

In a blind comparison, in the 12th week of stimulation, improvement was observed in all the tests. In TUG, time in seconds changed from 28 before to 18 after GVS ( < 0,001). In BBS, the score changed from 29.00 before to 41.00 points after GVS. In posturography, the stability limit improved after the intervention ( < 0.05). However, after nine months without stimulation, the gain was lost for TUG, for BBS and for stability limit.

CONCLUSION

GVS was an effective method to improve postural instability of patients with HAM in the short term, but the gain in postural stability was not maintained in the long term. A device for home use may be an option for long-term use.

摘要

引言

直流电前庭刺激(GVS)是一种简单、安全且无创的神经刺激方法,可用于改善身体平衡。几种中枢神经系统疾病会导致身体平衡改变,包括人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒1型相关脊髓病(HAM)。

目的

测试GVS作为HAM的平衡康复策略。

方法

本研究是一项准实验性临床试验,比较了20例HAM患者(12名女性和8名男性,平均年龄分别为78岁和79岁)在应用GVS康复方案前后的姿势平衡。在GVS方案结束后对他们进行了9个月的随访,该方案包括连续12周每周进行一次GVS治疗。GVS电流强度从第1次治疗的1.0毫安(mA)逐渐增加到第3次治疗时的3.5 mA,并在第12次治疗前保持在3.5 mA。电刺激时间从第一次治疗的9分钟逐渐增加到第二次治疗的18分钟,并从第三次治疗开始保持在30分钟。在干预开始前、干预期间(第6周)、干预结束时(第12周)以及无电刺激随访9个月后,通过起立行走测试(TUG)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)和姿势描记法评估姿势平衡。

结果

在盲法比较中,在刺激的第12周,所有测试均观察到改善。在TUG测试中,时间(秒)从GVS前的28秒变为GVS后的18秒(<0.001)。在BBS测试中,分数从GVS前的29.00分变为GVS后的41.00分。在姿势描记法中,干预后稳定性极限得到改善(<0.05)。然而,在无刺激9个月后,TUG、BBS和稳定性极限的改善效果消失。

结论

GVS是短期内改善HAM患者姿势不稳的有效方法,但姿势稳定性的改善在长期内未得到维持。家用设备可能是长期使用的一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9694/11693613/a0d5d245389e/fnhum-18-1507559-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验