• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

火罐疗法治疗神经性皮炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of wet cupping in the treatment of neurodermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhai Yan, Hui You-Yi, Jiang Ze-Fei, Ding Lin, Cheng Jie, Xing Tang, Zhai Han, Zhang Hong

机构信息

School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopathy, Xi'an Daxing Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 19;11:1478073. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1478073. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1478073
PMID:39748922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11693718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurodermatitis is a chronic skin condition characterized by intense itching and skin thickening due to neurological dysfunction. Its persistent nature poses a challenge to effective treatment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Wet cupping therapy is increasingly being used in clinics to manage neurodermatitis, so it is imperative to assess the evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wet cupping therapy in patients with neurodermatitis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating wet cupping for neurodermatitis were identified through searches of eight electronic databases and three clinical trial registration platforms from inception to March 2024, using predefined search terms. Included studies underwent quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment tool. The quality of evidence was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System (GRADE). Meta-analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using ReviewManager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software, respectively.

RESULTS

This review encompassed 19 studies, comprising 6 types of comparisons and involving 1,505 participants. The findings revealed no significant difference in the total effective rate between wet cupping alone and high-potency steroids ( = 269, RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.90, 1.41],  = 0.29, I = 83%). However, wet cupping combined with medication or moxibustion exhibited superior efficacy compared to medication alone ( = 272, RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.16, 1.41],  < 0.00001, I = 43%) and ( = 534, RR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.30],  < 0.00001, I = 0%). Wet cupping groups demonstrated lower recurrence rates ( = 266, RR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.16, 0.60],  = 0.0005, I = 0%) and a reduced incidence of adverse events ( = 673, RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.21, 0.90],  = 0.02, I = 36%). Furthermore, wet cupping alone or combined with moxibustion effectively lowered the levels of inflammatory factors compared to medication: TNF- ( = 120, MD = -6.99, 95% CI [-8.13, -5.85],  < 0.00001, I = 0%), IL-1β ( = 120, MD = -5.28, 95% CI [-6.91, -3.65],  < 0.00001, I = 48%), and IL-6 ( = 180, MD = -8.61, 95% CI [-13.24, -3.99],  = 0.0003, I = 81%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of wet cupping therapy is comparable to that of high-potency steroids. Its combined use with medication or moxibustion appears to enhance effectiveness, reduce recurrence rates, and improve safety. However, due to the overall low grade of evidence for the identified outcomes and poor methodological quality, caution is advised when interpreting and applying these findings in clinical practice.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42024524398.

摘要

背景

神经性皮炎是一种慢性皮肤病,其特征是由于神经功能障碍导致剧烈瘙痒和皮肤增厚。其持续性对有效治疗构成挑战,严重影响患者的生活质量。湿拔罐疗法在临床上越来越多地用于治疗神经性皮炎,因此评估其有效性和安全性的证据至关重要。

目的

本综述旨在评估湿拔罐疗法对神经性皮炎患者的疗效和安全性。

方法与分析

通过检索八个电子数据库和三个临床试验注册平台,使用预定义的检索词,识别从开始到2024年3月调查湿拔罐治疗神经性皮炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入的研究使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评估。两名评审员使用推荐分级评估、发展和评价系统(GRADE)独立评估证据质量。分别使用ReviewManager 5.4和STATA 17.0软件进行荟萃分析和发表偏倚评估。

结果

本综述纳入了19项研究,包括6种比较类型,涉及1505名参与者。结果显示,单纯湿拔罐与高效类固醇之间的总有效率无显著差异(n = 269,RR = 1.13,95%CI [0.90, 1.41],P = 0.29,I² = 83%)。然而,与单独用药相比,湿拔罐联合药物或艾灸表现出更高的疗效(n = 272,RR = 1.28,95%CI [1.16, 1.41],P < 0.00001,I² = 43%)和(n = 534,RR = 1.22,95%CI [1.14, 1.30],P < 0.00001,I² = 0%)。湿拔罐组的复发率较低(n = 266,RR = 0.31,95%CI [0.16, 0.60],P = 0.0005,I² = 0%),不良事件发生率降低(n = 673,RR = 0.44,95%CI [0.21, 0.90],P = 0.02,I² = 36%)。此外,与药物相比,单纯湿拔罐或联合艾灸能有效降低炎症因子水平:TNF-α(n = 120,MD = -6.99,95%CI [-8.13, -5.85],P < 0.00001,I² = 0%)、IL-1β(n = 120,MD = -5.28,95%CI [-6.91, -3.65],P < 0.00001,I² = 48%)和IL-6(n = 180,MD = -8.61,95%CI [-13.24, -3.99],P = 0.0003,I² = 81%)。

结论

湿拔罐疗法的疗效与高效类固醇相当。其与药物或艾灸联合使用似乎能提高疗效、降低复发率并改善安全性。然而,由于所确定结果的总体证据质量较低且方法学质量较差,在临床实践中解释和应用这些发现时建议谨慎。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero,标识符:CRD42024524398。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/010b72510a35/fmed-11-1478073-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/fc173321bc78/fmed-11-1478073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/73f922b07f26/fmed-11-1478073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/010b72510a35/fmed-11-1478073-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/fc173321bc78/fmed-11-1478073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/73f922b07f26/fmed-11-1478073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ec/11693718/010b72510a35/fmed-11-1478073-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of wet cupping in the treatment of neurodermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.火罐疗法治疗神经性皮炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 19;11:1478073. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1478073. eCollection 2024.
2
Cupping therapy for patients with chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.拔罐疗法治疗慢性荨麻疹患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Integr Med. 2020 Jul;18(4):303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Wet cupping therapy for treatment of herpes zoster: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.用于治疗带状疱疹的湿拔罐疗法:随机对照试验的系统评价
Altern Ther Health Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):48-54.
5
Auricular acupressure for constipation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人便秘的耳穴按压:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1257660. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1257660. eCollection 2023.
6
Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris.寻常痤疮的补充疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 19;1(1):CD009436. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009436.pub2.
7
The effectiveness of cupping therapy on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.拔罐疗法治疗腰痛的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Med. 2024 Mar;80:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103013. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Evaluation of efficacy and safety for compound kushen injection combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with malignant ascites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.复方苦参注射液联合腹腔化疗治疗恶性腹水患者的疗效和安全性评价:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 3;14:1036043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1036043. eCollection 2023.
9
Potential efficacy and safety of Xiyanping injection as adjuvant therapy in treatment of suppurative acute tonsillitis: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and certainty of evidence.喜炎平注射液作为辅助治疗化脓性急性扁桃体炎的潜在疗效和安全性:一项Meta分析、试验序贯分析及证据确定性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1327856. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1327856. eCollection 2024.
10
Electroacupuncture for post-stroke urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.电针治疗中风后尿失禁:一项采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1282580. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1282580. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment with Antihistamines and the Risk of Liver Cancer in Patients with Viral Hepatitis: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.抗组胺药物治疗与病毒性肝炎患者肝癌风险:一项多中心队列研究。
Viruses. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):940. doi: 10.3390/v16060940.
2
Key Factors in the Complex and Coordinated Network of Skin Keratinization: Their Significance and Involvement in Common Skin Conditions.皮肤角化复杂协调网络中的关键因素:它们的意义及其在常见皮肤状况中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 23;25(1):236. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010236.
3
Inflammatory Cytokines in Psoriatic Arthritis: Understanding Pathogenesis and Implications for Treatment.
银屑病关节炎中的炎症细胞因子:发病机制的理解及其对治疗的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 19;24(14):11662. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411662.
4
Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.干、湿拔罐疗法自我管理治疗腰痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 23;101(51):e32325. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032325.
5
Lichen Simplex Chronicus Itch: An Update.慢性单纯性苔藓瘙痒:更新。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Oct 19;102:adv00796. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.4367.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Topical Corticosteroids: Choice and Application.局部皮质类固醇:选择和应用。
Am Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 15;103(6):337-343.
8
Cupping Therapy for Diseases: An Overview of Scientific Evidence from 2009 to 2019.拔罐疗法治疗疾病:2009年至2019年科学证据综述
Chin J Integr Med. 2021 May;27(5):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s11655-020-3060-y. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
An Intimate Relationship Between Intralesional Depigmentation and Peripheral Nervous System in Lichen Simplex Chronicus.慢性单纯性苔藓皮损内色素脱失与周围神经系统的密切关系
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jan 30;100(1):adv00042. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3390.
10
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.