Chishti Syed Saad Ali, Niaz Abdal, Kashif Muhammad, Ali Wajid
Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, PAK.
Surgery, Cavan General Hospital, Cavan, IRL.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 3;16(12):e75012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75012. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Introduction The debate remains unresolved about whether an open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson) approach is superior for hemorrhoidectomy. Advocates from both groups state that each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. In light of this, we intend to share our experience by comparing the two in terms of their post-operative outcomes. This study aims to compare open (Milligan-Morgan) and closed (Ferguson) hemorrhoidectomy in terms of post-operative outcomes. Materials and methods This retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. A total of 137 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy from January 1, 2022, to May 31, 2024, were enrolled. Post-operative outcomes were noted in terms of surgical site infection (SSI), excessive bleeding, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 137 patients were enrolled in the study, with 93 (67.9%) undergoing Milligan-Morgan (open) hemorrhoidectomy and 44 (32.1%) undergoing the Ferguson (closed) procedure. The mean age in the open group was 46.87 ± 10.79 years, compared to 44.59 ± 9.06 years in the closed group. Male participants comprised 59 (63.4%) in the open group and 19 (43.2%) in the closed group. SSI was observed in 32 patients (23.3%); 22 (68.8%) were from the open group, and 10 (31.3%) were from the closed group (p-value, 0.905). Hemorrhage was recorded in 34 patients (15.3%), with 21 (61.8%) in the open group and 13 (38.2%) in the closed group (p-value, 0.378). The mean post-operative VAS pain score was 3.76 ± 1.79 for the open technique versus 4.07 ± 1.37 for the closed technique, respectively (p-value, 0.321). Conclusion Though the SSI and hemorrhage rates were higher with the Milligan-Morgan technique than with the Ferguson technique, the mean post-operative VAS score was also higher with the Milligan-Morgan procedure. However, none of the differences was found to be statistically significant.
引言
关于痔切除术采用开放式(Milligan-Morgan术式)还是封闭式(Ferguson术式)方法更优的争论仍未解决。两组的支持者都表示,每种方法都有其自身的优缺点。鉴于此,我们打算通过比较两者的术后结果来分享我们的经验。本研究旨在比较开放式(Milligan-Morgan术式)和封闭式(Ferguson术式)痔切除术的术后结果。
材料与方法
这项回顾性研究在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所外科进行。纳入了2022年1月1日至2024年5月31日期间接受痔切除术的137例患者。记录了手术部位感染(SSI)、出血过多和视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分等术后结果。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 25版(2017年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)对数据进行分析。
结果
本研究共纳入137例患者,其中93例(67.9%)接受了Milligan-Morgan(开放式)痔切除术,44例(32.1%)接受了Ferguson(封闭式)手术。开放组的平均年龄为46.87±10.79岁,而封闭组为44.59±9.06岁。开放组男性参与者有59例(占63.4%),封闭组有19例(占43.2%)。32例患者(23.3%)发生了手术部位感染;22例(68.8%)来自开放组,10例(31.3%)来自封闭组(p值为0.905)。34例患者(占15.3%)出现出血,其中开放组21例(占61.8%),封闭组13例(占38.2%)(p值为0.378)。开放技术的术后平均VAS疼痛评分为3.76±1.79,而封闭技术为4.07±1.37(p值为0.321)。
结论
虽然Milligan-Morgan技术的手术部位感染和出血率高于Ferguson技术,但Milligan-Morgan手术的术后平均VAS评分也更高。然而,未发现任何差异具有统计学意义。